Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Fairfield News And Herald
Story February 11, 1891

The Fairfield News And Herald

Winnsboro, Fairfield County, South Carolina

What is this article about?

Brooklyn Eagle article on February 6 detailing the new US House apportionment bill, increasing membership to 356 with gains for Western and Southern states, no loss for any, and its effects on the 1892 electoral vote, highlighting injustice to New York.

Merged-components note: Article on the apportionment bill including two associated tables; tables merged into the story due to spatial overlap and content relevance.

Clipping

OCR Quality

70% Good

Full Text

States.number.number.Gain
Alabama891
Arkansas561
California671
Colorado121
Georgia10111
Illinois20222
Kansas781
Massachusetts12131
Michigan11121
Minnesota572
Missouri14151
Nebraska363
New Jersey781
Oregon121
Pennsylvania28302
Texas11132
Washington121
Wisconsin9101

THE APPORTIONMENT.

The Injustice Done to New York and Other States.

BROOKLYN, Feb. 6.—The Brooklyn Eagle has compiled the following table on the new apportionment, which is of special interest. That paper says:

While the apportionment bill is generally regarded as a compromise, there can be no doubt that it does injustice to several States, including New York. Under its provisions the total membership of the House of Representatives after March 4, 1891, will be 356, an increase of twenty-four over the present number. No State loses a representative. One member each is gained by thirteen States, two each by four States, and three by one State.

This table illustrates the gain by States:

Present New

Of the twenty-four new members, fourteen go to the west. Nebraska's quota of three is doubled. Minnesota and Illinois gain two each. One each is added to California, Colorado, Michigan, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin. The South profits by the increase, but not so much as the west. If Missouri be counted a southern State, that section gains a total of six seats. Four of these go to Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia and Missouri, and the remaining two to Texas. In the middle States, Pennsylvania gains two and New Jersey one. Massachusetts, with an addition of one, is the only New England State that shows a change.

These changes will exert an important, though not a decisive, bearing on the electoral vote. Under the existing apportionment that vote is 401. Under the new bill there will be 414 members in the electoral college, requiring 223 to elect. The gain in electors by States is as follows:

Present New

If in 1892 the States should vote as the States and Territories voted in 1888, the Republicans would have 250 electors to 174 for the Democrats, a Republican majority of 76.
States.number.number.Gain
Alabama10111
Arkansas781
California891
Colorado341
Connecticut66
Delaware33
Florida44
Georgia12131
Illinois22242
Indiana1515
Iowa1313
Idaho33
Kansas9101
Kentucky1313
Louisiana88
Maine66
Maryland88
Massachusetts14151
Michigan13141
Minnesota793
Mississippi99
Missouri16171
Montana33
Nebraska583
Nevada53
New Hampshire44
New Jersey9101
New York3636
North Carolina1111
North Dakota33
Ohio2323
Oregon341
Pennsylvania30322
Rhode Island44
South Carolina99
South Dakota44
Tennessee1212
Texas13152
Vermont44
Virginia1212
West Virginia66
Wisconsin11121
Washington541
Wyoming33
Total49044454

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Justice

What keywords are associated?

Apportionment Bill House Representatives Electoral Votes State Gains New York Injustice Political Compromise

Where did it happen?

United States

Story Details

Location

United States

Event Date

Feb. 6, 1891

Story Details

The apportionment bill increases House membership to 356 after March 4, 1891, with no state losing seats; gains distributed to Western and Southern states, injustice noted for New York; electoral college expands to 414, potentially giving Republicans majority in 1892.

Are you sure?