Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Western Democrat
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
What is this article about?
General Lane of Oregon, in remarks reported by the National Intelligencer, defends Southern rights in territories, asserting they are common state property where slaveholders deserve legal protection, differing from Democrats Douglas and Pugh.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Mr Lane, of Oregon, briefly stated that, while he would not deny that Mr Douglas and Mr Pugh were good Democrats, he differed from them in their opinions on the Territorial question. For himself, he held that the Territories were the common property of all the States, whose citizens by every principle of equality and justice, were consequently entitled to enter the common domain with whatever was recognized as property by the law of their respective States; and that property of whatever kind, when thus removed to this common domain, was equally entitled to protection from the law-making power. The Territorial Legislature could not establish or prohibit slavery, but could and should protect the slaveholder in the enjoyment of his right to the labor of his slave so long as the Territorial condition lasted: and, if this protection were not furnished by the Territorial Legislature, it would be the duty of Congress to afford it.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Story Details
Key Persons
Story Details
Gen. Lane of Oregon argues that territories are common property of all states, entitling citizens to bring property including slaves, which must be protected by territorial legislatures or Congress, differing from Douglas and Pugh on the territorial question.