Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Asheville Daily Citizen
Letter to Editor January 26, 1891

Asheville Daily Citizen

Asheville, Buncombe County, North Carolina

What is this article about?

A letter warns the editor about risks in kaolin mining investments in Jackson County for a potential porcelain factory at Biltmore, Asheville. It highlights misleading options, the failure of the Equitable Kaolin Company at Sylva, high freight costs, and competition from established potteries, advising caution to investors.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

LETTERS BY THE PEOPLE.

VARIOUS TOPICS DISCUSSED HEREWITH.

Kaolin Mining and the Jackson County Options—The Silver Question Up—Danger to Children.

EDITOR THE CITIZEN:—The wealthy manufacturer of porcelain or French china ware, who is considering the erection of works at Biltmore station, our city, is expected here to look into the feasibility of investing capital on a solid and paying basis.

Many points have to be investigated thoroughly and by parties fully posted in the business in all its details.

The location for the works must be along one or more railroads in existence, and not prospective or promised ones. The deposits of materials intended to be used should be fully developed and tests made by disinterested parties as to quality and quantity. There have been about fifty options taken in Jackson county on old mica holes, where kaolin has been found in small veins, and parties not understanding the business or wishing to deceive others call them kaolin mines. The Equitable kaolin company at Sylva has suffered on that account, and their large works with elegant machinery are standing idle, not able to pay their hands for several months and judgments being obtained against them for debts. The kaolin prepared by them was not considered of first quality, which is the only kind that will pay to ship from there, with a freight of $5 per ton to the potteries.

A potter may understand the moulding or making of ware, firing the same and other branches of this industry, but know nothing of mining and preparing of kaolin, flint and spar, and I dare say that very few manufacturers of pottery have ever seen a mine of that sort. The manufacture of white granite or so-called stone china (a fictitious name) will never, in my opinion, be a success financially at this place in competition with the large potteries at East Liverpool, O., Trenton, N. J., and the English importers.

I think the right man has been found and expected here to look into the business. Capitalists wishing to invest money in the same will do well to go slow and await further developments.

Respectfully,

CERAMIC OBSERVER.

Asheville, Jan. 24.

What sub-type of article is it?

Informative Persuasive

What themes does it cover?

Commerce Trade

What keywords are associated?

Kaolin Mining Jackson County Options Porcelain Manufacturing Biltmore Investment Equitable Kaolin Company Sylva Failure

What entities or persons were involved?

Ceramic Observer Editor The Citizen

Letter to Editor Details

Author

Ceramic Observer

Recipient

Editor The Citizen

Main Argument

investors should exercise caution in kaolin mining options in jackson county due to misleading claims, poor quality deposits, the failure of existing operations like the equitable kaolin company, high shipping costs, and intense competition from established potteries, making porcelain manufacturing at biltmore unlikely to succeed financially.

Notable Details

Equitable Kaolin Company At Sylva Idle Due To Debts Freight Cost $5 Per Ton Competition From East Liverpool O., Trenton N.J., English Importers Options On Old Mica Holes Misrepresented As Kaolin Mines

Are you sure?