Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
February 7, 1817
The Rhode Island American, And General Advertiser
Providence, Providence County, Rhode Island
What is this article about?
The editorial defends the Young Bostonian's published letters as promising youthful work, despite the Old Bostonian's harsh, uncandid critiques. It criticizes the critic's ill-nature and questions the parents' decision to publish, warning against over-encouraging precocity. (248 characters)
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
We have now concluded the publication of the Old Bostonian's Remarks on the Young Bostonian's Letters; which, for several weeks past, have occupied a considerable portion of our miscellaneous department. Without wishing to appear the champions of the Young Bostonian, we frankly acknowledge our conviction that the remarks of his adversary have failed to rob his letters of the praise which justly belongs to them. They were unquestionably the lighter effusions of a youthful, but more than ordinary, mind; which, when matured by age and disciplined by culture, might be capable of higher efforts. The Old Bostonian, in his zeal to detect and expose defects, has at times appeared ill-natured and uncandid—more solicitous to establish his prowess as a critick and his reputation as a writer than to satisfy the reasonable claims of justice, or regard the susceptible feelings of youth. In short, he authorizes the publick to form a more favourable estimate of his head than his heart.
The parents of the Young Bostonian perhaps merited the "grave rebuke" of this experienced censor; or, in the indulgence of parental partiality and, probably, for the gratification of parental vanity, they injudiciously published the letters of their son, which certainly had no especial claim to publick notice. They should have reflected on the danger of unduly encouraging precocious talents, in young men, who too often relapse into the torpor of mental inexertion, when they catch, prematurely, "the fleeting echoes of renown."
The parents of the Young Bostonian perhaps merited the "grave rebuke" of this experienced censor; or, in the indulgence of parental partiality and, probably, for the gratification of parental vanity, they injudiciously published the letters of their son, which certainly had no especial claim to publick notice. They should have reflected on the danger of unduly encouraging precocious talents, in young men, who too often relapse into the torpor of mental inexertion, when they catch, prematurely, "the fleeting echoes of renown."
What sub-type of article is it?
Literary Criticism
Parental Indulgence
What keywords are associated?
Young Bostonian Letters
Old Bostonian Criticism
Literary Defense
Parental Vanity
Youthful Talent
What entities or persons were involved?
Young Bostonian
Old Bostonian
Parents Of The Young Bostonian
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Young Bostonian's Letters Against Old Bostonian's Criticism
Stance / Tone
Supportive Of Young Bostonian, Critical Of Old Bostonian
Key Figures
Young Bostonian
Old Bostonian
Parents Of The Young Bostonian
Key Arguments
Young Bostonian's Letters Are Praiseworthy Effusions Of A Youthful Mind With Potential For Higher Efforts
Old Bostonian's Remarks Fail To Diminish The Letters' Value And Appear Ill Natured And Uncandid
Old Bostonian Prioritizes His Reputation Over Justice And Youth's Feelings
Parents May Have Injudiciously Published The Letters Due To Partiality And Vanity
Undue Encouragement Of Precocious Talents Risks Mental Inexertion Later