Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
November 14, 1884
The San Antonio Light
San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas
What is this article about?
The New York Tribune editorial reflects on the close presidential election, emphasizing the power and responsibility of the individual vote. It criticizes non-voters for shirking civic duty, even in a choice of evils, and urges deliberate participation in future elections.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
Under the head of "The man who did not vote," the New York Tribune says: "The closeness of the election has given voters in this and adjoining States a new consciousness of the power and influence of the individual ballot. The choice of a President and the control of the National Administration for four years have been determined by a few hundred votes. Any citizen who has brought his influence to bear even upon a narrow circle of acquaintances is therefore entitled to consider himself a factor of considerable importance in the solution of the year's political problem. It seldom happens that the election of a President has been so directly dependent upon the deliberate choice of the individual voter. This is a reflection which should have a sobering effect both upon impulsive and cautious citizens. If the ballot this year has given the individual voter an impressive sense of personal power, it has also carried with it a tremendous weight of personal responsibility. In view of these facts what can be said in favor of the man who didn't vote? He had five months in which to reach a decision and in the end stayed at home, either from inability or unwillingness to make an intelligent choice. He deliberately shirked the responsibility of citizenship, declining to make what he considered a choice of evils. The election has now passed and he has the melancholy satisfaction of counting himself a political cipher in an exciting contest of the highest importance in which every unit proved in the end to possess a determining value. We do not think the position of the man who didn't vote is at all enviable. He lacked either the courage, the intelligence or the conscience to make his influence felt either on one side or the other. Even if it were a choice of evils, as he claimed it to be, it was his duty as a citizen to make that choice and to give positive weight to his influence as a citizen. The individual voter only deserves respect and consideration when he weighs parties and men in the balance and gives the country the benefit of a deliberated choice."
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Social Reform
What keywords are associated?
Individual Vote
Election Responsibility
Non Voter Critique
Civic Duty
Presidential Election
What entities or persons were involved?
New York Tribune
Individual Voter
Non Voter
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Non Voters In Close Presidential Election
Stance / Tone
Critical Of Abstention And Exhortative On Civic Duty
Key Figures
New York Tribune
Individual Voter
Non Voter
Key Arguments
Closeness Of Election Underscores Power Of Individual Ballot
Non Voter Shirks Responsibility Of Citizenship
Even Choice Of Evils Requires Deliberate Participation
Voter Deserves Respect Only Through Weighed Choice