Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeLynchburg Daily Virginian
Lynchburg, Virginia
What is this article about?
Southern newspapers across parties criticize the rapid increase in federal government expenses from $60 million to an estimated $100 million, calculating per-voter costs and questioning compatibility with republican simplicity, fearing emulation of European monarchies.
OCR Quality
Full Text
The number of voters in the last Presidential campaign was 4,049,054. The expenses of the Government last year were $60,000,000. This amount divided among the voters, is nearly $20 to each man, and that is what each voter actually pays for the support of the Government. The expenses for next year are estimated at $100,000,000, which is nearly $25 to each man. Is this enormous expenditure necessary? Does it comport with the simplicity of our Republican institutions? Have we not rather reason to fear that a spirit of rivalry with aristocratic monarchies of Europe is springing up, and will degenerate into luxury, the bane of all the early Republics?
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
Where did it happen?
Story Details
Location
Southern States, Alabama
Story Details
Southern papers criticize doubling of federal government expenses without cause, quoting Alabama's Southern Rights Democrat on per-voter costs rising from nearly $20 to $25, questioning necessity, republican simplicity, and fearing luxury like European monarchies.