Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Nome Nugget
Nome, Nome County, Alaska
What is this article about?
Korean armistice talks recessed until Wednesday after stormy exchange over POW repatriation. U.N. negotiators, led by Lt. Gen. Harrison, defend voluntary return principle against Communist coercion accusations. U.S. State Dept. issues statement rejecting compromise, amid pressure from India, Britain, Canada.
OCR Quality
Full Text
MUNSAN, (AP) - The Korean armistice talks recessed until Wednesday after another stormy exchange Saturday over U.N. and Communist proposals to end the long prisoner exchange deadlock.
The Communists angrily accused U.N. negotiators of destroying the "basis" of the negotiations and called on them to "withdraw this absurd proposal."
Lt. Gen. William K. Harrison, charged the Reds with trying "to corece unwilling prisoners to return to unwanted masters."
Harrison said he asked for the three-day recess for "administrative reasons." He declined to elaborate.
Observers pointed out, the recess would provide an opportunity for top-level conferences at a time when criticism of the U.S. position is building up among friendly nations.
The U.S. State Department Friday night took the unusual step of issuing a formal statement defending the "fundamental humanitarian principle" of letting prisoners of the Korean war choose whether they will go home.
There can be no compromise, the State Department said in the statement apparently aimed at critics at home and abroad.
The department said every possibility for an honorable truce will be explored, but there can be no agreement which would condemn some prisoners to "indefinite captivity."
India, Britain and Canada all have brought pressure on the U.S. to reach an agreement on the basis of the Communists' May 7 proposal.
Harrison refused to comment on the criticism.
"I don't know the attitude of our government and our friends across the seas," he told newsmen outside the Panmunjom conference hut. "All I know is what we are doing here."
Harrison pointed out that inside the hut the fundamental positions of the two sides still are "clearly in opposition."
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Foreign News Details
Primary Location
Munsan, Korea
Event Date
Saturday, Recess Until Wednesday; State Dept. Statement Friday Night; Communists' May 7 Proposal
Key Persons
Outcome
talks recessed for three days; ongoing deadlock over pow repatriation; u.s. rejects compromise amid international pressure
Event Details
Korean armistice talks recessed until Wednesday after stormy Saturday exchange over U.N. and Communist POW proposals. Communists accuse U.N. of destroying negotiation basis; Harrison charges Reds with coercing unwilling prisoners. Recess for administrative reasons amid building criticism. U.S. State Dept. defends voluntary repatriation principle, no compromise allowing indefinite captivity. Pressure from India, Britain, Canada for Communist May 7 proposal. Harrison notes opposing positions.