Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Sauk Centre Herald
Editorial March 6, 1890

The Sauk Centre Herald

Sauk Centre, Stearns County, Minnesota

What is this article about?

Editorial from Sauk Centre Herald refutes free-trade argument by Rep. Mills that import duties fully raise domestic prices, using official data on steel rails (1870-1890) showing U.S. production often undersold imported rails despite tariffs, sourced from Iron and Steel Association and New York Tribune.

Merged-components note: table of steel rail prices is integral to the editorial discussion on duties and prices; sequential reading order and topical continuity justify merge

Clipping

OCR Quality

75% Good

Full Text

SAUK CENTRE HERALD:
Thursday March 6, 1890.

DUTIES AND PRICES.

THE ancient statement, never true when first made and often completely refuted, that the entire duty on imported articles is added to the price of protected products in this country, is once more repeated by Mr. Mills, of Texas, in an article contributed to "The North American Review."

"The Bulletin" of the Iron and Steel Association takes occasion to reply with most convincing figures, on the very branch of trade which Mr. Mills selects as the most satisfactory test.

Referring to the similar statement made by Mr. Cleveland, Mr. Mills remarks, "I will take steel rails to start with," and in reply The Bulletin submits from official data prices of steel rails each in this country and in Great Britain with the quantity produced in the United States. In the years 1867-1870, inclusive, the duty on rails was 45 per cent ad valorem; thence to August 1, 1872, it was $28 per ton; thence to March 3, 1875 it was $25.20 per ton; thence to July 1, 1883, it was $28 per ton, and since that time has been $17 per ton. This is to be added to the British price, and also the cost of transportation, commissions and insurance, which "The Bulletin" reckons at $3 per ton, though it is in almost every instance larger. As duties and freights have to be paid in gold, there must also be added, for comparison with American prices in currency, the premium on gold for the earlier years, which averaged 2 per cent in 1878, 5 per cent in 1877, 10 per cent in 1876, 14 per cent in 1875, 12 per cent in 1874, 13 per cent in 1873, 12 per cent in 1872, and 1871, and 15 per cent in 1870. With these additions the cost of steel rails in Great Britain, given in the first column of the following table, would be raised to the figures given in the second column, representing total cost of rails imported, duty paid in currency, and in the third column is shown the average price of the American rails for the same years:

Ratio.

The above table is constructed from the figures given by "The Bulletin," the cost of imported articles in currency being calculated for comparison. But for the year 1875 prior to March 3 the duty was but $25.20, and the cost imported would have been but $82.62, and for the year 1872 after August 1, the duty being $25.20 per ton, the cost of imported rails would have been $107.33. Thus constructed, the table shows at a glance that in only one year since 1872 has the cost of American rails been as much as the cost of foreign rails with duty and other charges added. It should be remembered that, the manufacture having been begun in this country in 1866, only 84,000 tons were here produced as late as the year 1872, and the American production had not at that time large enough to affect the price materially.

From that time onward the American manufacturers have steadily undersold the imported product, excepting in the year 1880, when the demand for rails so far exceeded the capacity of American works that the average price was somewhat higher than that of imported rails.

It will appear from this table also that the cost in this country has been greatly reduced until the makers have been able to sell for some years past at a price from $12 to $15 per ton below the price of imported rails; that the price has been constantly determined by home competition, and that since the advance in the cost abroad this year, the American price is just the same as the price in England. More complete refutation of the old free-trade theory could not well be imagined, and yet it is safe to say that the figures, however conclusive, will not prevent Mr. Mills or any of his associates from repeating the same untrue statement whenever it happens to fit their purpose. -New York Tribune.
Price.CostPrice.
1870$50 37$83 98$106 95
187154 99102 31102 50
187267 64110 47112 00
187389 05122 31120 50
187468 75108 5894 25
187544 2885 8268 76
187632 1269 4359 25
187729 2063 2145 50
187825 5557 6842 25
187926 8857 8848 25
188034 4265 4267 40
183130 4161 4161 13
188226 2757 2748 50
188322 7253 7237 75
1883222 7242 7237 75
188423 1943 1930 75
188523 1143 1128 50
188618 7038 7034 50
188819 7039 7037 08
188819 1539 1529 83
188924 5744 5729 25
1890Feb 35 0055 0035 00

What sub-type of article is it?

Economic Policy Taxation Trade Or Commerce

What keywords are associated?

Tariffs Steel Rails Import Duties Protectionism Free Trade Prices Economic Policy

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Mills Of Texas Mr. Cleveland Iron And Steel Association New York Tribune

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Refutation Of Free Trade Claims On Tariffs Adding To Domestic Prices Using Steel Rails Example

Stance / Tone

Pro Tariff Protectionism, Critical Of Free Trade Arguments

Key Figures

Mr. Mills Of Texas Mr. Cleveland Iron And Steel Association New York Tribune

Key Arguments

Import Duties Do Not Fully Add To Domestic Prices Of Protected Goods Steel Rail Prices In U.S. Often Lower Than Imported Equivalents Including Duties And Costs American Production Undersold Imports Since 1872 Except 1880 Home Competition Determines U.S. Prices, Not Tariffs Recent U.S. Prices Match English Prices Despite Tariffs

Are you sure?