Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
July 13, 1836
Republican Herald
Providence, Providence County, Rhode Island
What is this article about?
Editorial defends Martin Van Buren against The Journal's inconsistent attacks on his casting vote prohibiting incendiary papers via mail, accusing it of flip-flopping on labeling him a friend of slavery or abolitionist, while Whigs regionally contradict each other.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
THE CASTING VOTE.
The Journal comes out with an attack on Martin Van Buren for his casting vote on the question of prohibiting the transportation of incendiary papers, &c. per mail. It makes a bungling attempt to enlist the feelings and prejudices of the abolitionists against him on this account—The Journal is famous for turning somersets—It is the most sprightly thing for such feats, we ever saw. But little more than a year since, it took the same ground, and charged Mr. Van Buren with being the friend of slavery. They found this was no go, and subsequently, it joined with all its might in the cry against the abolitionists.
Then, forsooth, the veracious Journal charged Mr. Van Buren with being an abolitionist!—That wouldn't work, and now they are back again on the old ground! What wonderful consistency!—And thus, while the whigs of the South, are laboring with all their might and main, to make Martin Van Buren out an abolitionist, their brethren, of the North, are toiling with equal zeal and perseverance, to prove that he is the friend of slavery!
'Tug away, gentlemen—tug away—the people know you—They have some information collected from other sources than federal papers, and they will let you know it next Autumn. Remember the old stanzas—
"He digg'd a pit and digg'd it deep,
And digg'd it for his brother;
But by his sin he did fall in
The pit he digg'd for t'other.'
The Journal comes out with an attack on Martin Van Buren for his casting vote on the question of prohibiting the transportation of incendiary papers, &c. per mail. It makes a bungling attempt to enlist the feelings and prejudices of the abolitionists against him on this account—The Journal is famous for turning somersets—It is the most sprightly thing for such feats, we ever saw. But little more than a year since, it took the same ground, and charged Mr. Van Buren with being the friend of slavery. They found this was no go, and subsequently, it joined with all its might in the cry against the abolitionists.
Then, forsooth, the veracious Journal charged Mr. Van Buren with being an abolitionist!—That wouldn't work, and now they are back again on the old ground! What wonderful consistency!—And thus, while the whigs of the South, are laboring with all their might and main, to make Martin Van Buren out an abolitionist, their brethren, of the North, are toiling with equal zeal and perseverance, to prove that he is the friend of slavery!
'Tug away, gentlemen—tug away—the people know you—They have some information collected from other sources than federal papers, and they will let you know it next Autumn. Remember the old stanzas—
"He digg'd a pit and digg'd it deep,
And digg'd it for his brother;
But by his sin he did fall in
The pit he digg'd for t'other.'
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Slavery Abolition
What keywords are associated?
Martin Van Buren
Casting Vote
Incendiary Papers
Abolitionists
Whigs
Slavery
Journal Inconsistency
What entities or persons were involved?
Martin Van Buren
The Journal
Abolitionists
Whigs
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Against Attacks On Van Buren's Casting Vote
Stance / Tone
Supportive Of Van Buren, Mocking Journal And Whigs
Key Figures
Martin Van Buren
The Journal
Abolitionists
Whigs
Key Arguments
Journal Inconsistently Attacks Van Buren As Friend Of Slavery Then Abolitionist
Southern Whigs Portray Van Buren As Abolitionist While Northern Whigs Call Him Friend Of Slavery
People Will Reject These Tactics In Next Election