Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
February 16, 1802
Alexandria Advertiser And Commercial Intelligencer
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
Satirical commentary criticizing Pennsylvania Governor McKean's message defending federal judgeships and opposing their removal, contrasting it with his past democratic principles. References surprise at a bar petition and senatorial votes on judiciary act repeal.
OCR Quality
92%
Excellent
Full Text
The petition of the gentlemen of the bar of Pennsylvania, as well democrats as federalists, is said to have excited surprise amongst certain folks at Washington. If this document was surprising to them, what must the late Message of Governor M'Kean have been! It must have been amazing—astonishing.
"What," says Dr. L—n, "is our Governor about to quit us—is he reverting to the doctrines of the 'old school?' If not, how can we reconcile his present with his late principles and practice? The following sentences convey a most severe censure on my senatorial conduct in voting for the repeal of the late judiciary act—nay, on the majority in the Senate of the United States.
"For the State of Pennsylvania to pass an act, declaring it incompatible on a person to hold at the same time an office of the State and the United States, the Governor says, would be 'unnecessary, inexpedient and ALARMING to all persons holding OFFICES DURING GOOD BEHAVIOUR—the tenure of such commissions ought not to depend ON EVERY GALE THAT BLOWS.'
By this his Excellency must mean 'the gale' which we have been 'blowing up' in Senate. This is not a very decent insinuation, Mr. Governor, against your fellow labourers in the 'rough of democra-cy.' But his Excellency continues—The Legislature cannot vacate or impair a contract solemnly made between the common-wealth and an individual.
This indeed is fine doctrine to the sovereign people—Why, most assuredly, the old Governor imagines he is once more a judge, or is about coming again to his old federal principles. He goes on to say
."The office may be abolished in manner civil: but the officer say cannot be removed without being convicted a malfeasance in office." By this is rank federal doctrine. It is precisely what G. Morris Tracy, Hillhouse, &c. have been preaching to us so long, but happily without effect—Ca ira, Ca ira. Governor, you have been a judge, and therefore are interested in the question. Perhaps, too, you are looking to a seat as Chief Justice on the bench of the Supreme Court of the U. States—a bench we shall soon purify when we have turned the inferior judges adrift! No, no, may it please your Ex-cellency, we shall not consult you—down, down it must go—away with circuit and all other courts—reason and liberty for ever, says Dr. L—n."
"What," says Dr. L—n, "is our Governor about to quit us—is he reverting to the doctrines of the 'old school?' If not, how can we reconcile his present with his late principles and practice? The following sentences convey a most severe censure on my senatorial conduct in voting for the repeal of the late judiciary act—nay, on the majority in the Senate of the United States.
"For the State of Pennsylvania to pass an act, declaring it incompatible on a person to hold at the same time an office of the State and the United States, the Governor says, would be 'unnecessary, inexpedient and ALARMING to all persons holding OFFICES DURING GOOD BEHAVIOUR—the tenure of such commissions ought not to depend ON EVERY GALE THAT BLOWS.'
By this his Excellency must mean 'the gale' which we have been 'blowing up' in Senate. This is not a very decent insinuation, Mr. Governor, against your fellow labourers in the 'rough of democra-cy.' But his Excellency continues—The Legislature cannot vacate or impair a contract solemnly made between the common-wealth and an individual.
This indeed is fine doctrine to the sovereign people—Why, most assuredly, the old Governor imagines he is once more a judge, or is about coming again to his old federal principles. He goes on to say
."The office may be abolished in manner civil: but the officer say cannot be removed without being convicted a malfeasance in office." By this is rank federal doctrine. It is precisely what G. Morris Tracy, Hillhouse, &c. have been preaching to us so long, but happily without effect—Ca ira, Ca ira. Governor, you have been a judge, and therefore are interested in the question. Perhaps, too, you are looking to a seat as Chief Justice on the bench of the Supreme Court of the U. States—a bench we shall soon purify when we have turned the inferior judges adrift! No, no, may it please your Ex-cellency, we shall not consult you—down, down it must go—away with circuit and all other courts—reason and liberty for ever, says Dr. L—n."
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Legal Reform
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
Governor M'kean
Judiciary Act Repeal
Federal Judges
Partisan Politics
Pennsylvania Legislature
Office Tenure
What entities or persons were involved?
Governor M'kean
Dr. L—N
G. Morris Tracy
Hillhouse
Senate Of The United States
Pennsylvania Bar
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Governor Mckean's Defense Of Federal Judiciary
Stance / Tone
Satirical Criticism
Key Figures
Governor M'kean
Dr. L—N
G. Morris Tracy
Hillhouse
Senate Of The United States
Pennsylvania Bar
Key Arguments
Governor's Message Censures Senatorial Vote For Judiciary Act Repeal
Opposing State Act To Bar Dual Office Holding As Alarming To Good Behavior Offices
Legislature Cannot Impair Contracts With Officers
Federal Doctrine Against Removing Officers Without Malfeasance Conviction
Accusation Of Governor Reverting To Federal Principles