Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Fowle's New Hampshire Gazette And General Advertiser
Domestic News May 13, 1785

Fowle's New Hampshire Gazette And General Advertiser

Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire

What is this article about?

Boston reports widespread disapproval of the Stamp Act passed by the General Court, especially the duty on newspapers, criticized for restricting information, being impolitic by favoring out-of-state papers, and unequal in impacting local printers.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

BOSTON, May 9.

The STAMP-ACT, passed the last session of the General Court, meets throughout every part of the commonwealth with disapprobation, that part laying a duty on News-Papers, particularly so. The cloven foot in it appears too visible to escape notice. To clog the currents of information--and to Shackle the means of political knowledge and necessary learning--are discordant notes to the general ear. But its danger is not the whole of its evil consequences. It is deemed impolitic and unequal--impolitic, as it will encourage our sister states to send their papers into this commonwealth cheaper than can possibly be afforded here, to the ruin of a set of artisans, whose exertions in the late revolution deserve a more liberal fate.--Unequal, as the revenue arising from News Papers must (while but a mite in the general treasury) operate, in a great degree, to the destruction of the present printers of these publications.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Economic

What keywords are associated?

Stamp Act Newspaper Duty Public Disapprobation Local Printers General Court

Where did it happen?

Boston

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Boston

Event Date

May 9

Outcome

widespread disapprobation throughout the commonwealth; potential ruin of local printers.

Event Details

The Stamp Act, passed in the last session of the General Court, is met with disapproval across the commonwealth, particularly the duty on newspapers, seen as restricting information and political knowledge, impolitic by encouraging cheaper out-of-state papers, and unequal in destroying local printers who aided the revolution.

Are you sure?