Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Martinsburg Gazette And Public Advertiser
Domestic News May 18, 1826

Martinsburg Gazette And Public Advertiser

Martinsburg, Berkeley County, West Virginia

What is this article about?

In a Tuesday debate in the House, Mr. Kremer opposed the bill to aid the Illinois Canal, introduced by Mr. Cook, arguing it was a speculation to acquire lands and moving to lay it on the table.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Mr. Kremer took a distinguished part on Tuesday, in the debate on the bill to aid the Illinois Canal, which was introduced and explained by Mr. Cook. According to the National Journal.

Mr. Kremer said he should be paying but a bad tribute to the House, if, after the long grace which had been said over the dish which had been so well cooked, he should endeavour to say any thing in addition to the grace. Though the dish was ever so well cooked, he thought the house was not prepared to eat it. He would, therefore, move to lay the dish on the table. He had hoped the speaking mania had ceased, and he had not given his reasons for his motion to lay on the table. He would say a few words why he would not vote for the bill.—He did not wish the child christened at all. He viewed this canal as a speculation to get away our lands. You want to build houses, and to put people in them. Shall we vote our money away to make this canal in the wilderness? Forbid it. Heaven!

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Infrastructure

What keywords are associated?

Illinois Canal Congressional Debate Bill Opposition Kremer Speech

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Kremer Mr. Cook

Domestic News Details

Event Date

Tuesday

Key Persons

Mr. Kremer Mr. Cook

Outcome

mr. kremer moved to lay the bill on the table and stated he would not vote for it.

Event Details

Mr. Kremer participated in the debate on the bill to aid the Illinois Canal, introduced and explained by Mr. Cook. He used metaphors of a dish and a child to express opposition, viewing the canal as a speculation to acquire lands in the wilderness, and argued against voting money for it.

Are you sure?