Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeCottonwood Report
Cottonwood, Idaho County, Idaho
What is this article about?
The claim by political prisoners Richard and Walker for British intervention in Hawaii was refuted by evidence of their naturalization and legislative service, disappointing royalists. British Commissioner Hawes was deceived and will report accordingly.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Royalists Disappointed by the Result of Richard and Walker Case.
San Francisco, May 28.—The steamship China arrived from Honolulu tonight, bringing the following advices under date of May 20:
The correspondence between British Commissioner Hawes and the foreign office will soon close with the laurels in the hands of the foreign office. The claim made by the political prisoners, Richard and Walker, has been completely refuted by the evidence submitted by the foreign office. The written application of these men for naturalization, the payment of the fees, the taking of the oath of allegiance and the service of a year in the legislature one of them has been carefully proved.
The British commissioner finds that he was deceived by the statement of these men, and will so report to the British foreign office. It was the expectation of these men that the British government would interfere in a summary manner and the royalists are bitterly disappointed that the case goes against them.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Honolulu
Event Date
May 20
Key Persons
Outcome
claim refuted; royalists disappointed; commissioner deceived and will report to british foreign office
Event Details
Correspondence between British Commissioner Hawes and the foreign office concludes with the foreign office refuting the naturalization claim of political prisoners Richard and Walker through evidence of their application, fee payment, oath of allegiance, and one year's legislative service.