Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
January 14, 1892
The Anderson Intelligencer
Anderson, Anderson County, South Carolina
What is this article about?
Editorial warns of Democratic divisions on prohibition in South Carolina, highlighting opposition from Straightout Democrats, mild support from Tillman faction, Governor Tillman's hesitation, and potential candidacy of L.D. Childs to push the issue in upcoming elections.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
A Red-Handed Warning.
The following, dated from this city and bearing the stamp of "special correspondence," appears in a copy of the New York Voice, the leading temperance paper of the country. The copy was sent to the governor's office, and pointing to it is the warning forefinger of a large hand put on with red ink.
"The Straightout Democrats opposed prohibition to a man in the recent fight over the Childs bill in this State, while the Tillman Democrats favored it in a mild form, as proposed in the Tillman (Senate) bill. Governor Tillman was evidently afraid to allow his administration to commit itself on the question, and while he was said to have suggested and commended the Timmerman Bill he is evidently pleased that nothing was done.
"The great question now is whether prohibition will enter politics another year. Secretary of State Tindal, who is known as a shrewd, far-seeing man, and who is, as well, a prominent member of the Alliance, expressed the opinion the other day that it would. It is stated that Mr. L. D. Childs, the father of prohibition in this State, will become a candidate for Governor in the next campaign. He wants the nomination of the reform, or "Tillman" Democrats, and wants prohibition incorporated in the platform."
—Columbia State, January 12.
The following, dated from this city and bearing the stamp of "special correspondence," appears in a copy of the New York Voice, the leading temperance paper of the country. The copy was sent to the governor's office, and pointing to it is the warning forefinger of a large hand put on with red ink.
"The Straightout Democrats opposed prohibition to a man in the recent fight over the Childs bill in this State, while the Tillman Democrats favored it in a mild form, as proposed in the Tillman (Senate) bill. Governor Tillman was evidently afraid to allow his administration to commit itself on the question, and while he was said to have suggested and commended the Timmerman Bill he is evidently pleased that nothing was done.
"The great question now is whether prohibition will enter politics another year. Secretary of State Tindal, who is known as a shrewd, far-seeing man, and who is, as well, a prominent member of the Alliance, expressed the opinion the other day that it would. It is stated that Mr. L. D. Childs, the father of prohibition in this State, will become a candidate for Governor in the next campaign. He wants the nomination of the reform, or "Tillman" Democrats, and wants prohibition incorporated in the platform."
—Columbia State, January 12.
What sub-type of article is it?
Temperance
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Prohibition
Temperance
Democrats
Tillman
Childs Bill
South Carolina Politics
Alliance
What entities or persons were involved?
Straightout Democrats
Tillman Democrats
Governor Tillman
Secretary Of State Tindal
L. D. Childs
New York Voice
Columbia State
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Democratic Stances On Prohibition Legislation
Stance / Tone
Warning Against Political Hesitation On Prohibition
Key Figures
Straightout Democrats
Tillman Democrats
Governor Tillman
Secretary Of State Tindal
L. D. Childs
New York Voice
Columbia State
Key Arguments
Straightout Democrats Opposed Prohibition In The Childs Bill
Tillman Democrats Favored Mild Prohibition As In Tillman Bill
Governor Tillman Avoided Committing His Administration To Prohibition
Tillman Suggested But Was Pleased Nothing Was Done On Timmerman Bill
Prohibition Likely To Enter Politics Next Year Per Tindal
L. D. Childs Plans To Run For Governor Seeking Tillman Democrat Nomination With Prohibition Platform