Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
December 10, 1828
Phenix Gazette
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial republishes a letter criticizing South Carolina Delegation for disunion projects, defending Hartford Convention against similar past accusations and highlighting hypocrisy in Southern politics.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
An able writer in the Boston Courier has addressed a letter to the South Carolina Delegation in Congress, which we re-publish with more than usual pleasure. It has long been the fashion to revile the Hartford Convention and accuse the members of that body with treasonable and traitorous designs.
Without attempting to go into an examination of the truth of these charges, it is sufficiently manifest that the Disunion projects of some of the Southern politicians exceed in enormity and wickedness the worst that was ever laid at the door of the Hartford Convention.
We confess that we have enough of the "old leaven" (as our opponents would term it) about us yet, to make us rejoice that the tables are now turned upon those who have hunted us down, and for a series of years been taunting us with such epithets as "tory" and "disunionist."
Admit the Hartford Convention to have been all that is said of it, the impartial historian will record on the same page, as being equally base and black, the Disunion meeting of the South Carolina Delegation.
If the gentlemen to whom this letter is addressed be not callous, they must feel sensibly the home thrusts of the writer. He is dignified, yet severe—he speaks plainly, yet elegantly. We hope the editors of papers in South Carolina will not neglect an article, which may open the eyes of some of their readers.
Without attempting to go into an examination of the truth of these charges, it is sufficiently manifest that the Disunion projects of some of the Southern politicians exceed in enormity and wickedness the worst that was ever laid at the door of the Hartford Convention.
We confess that we have enough of the "old leaven" (as our opponents would term it) about us yet, to make us rejoice that the tables are now turned upon those who have hunted us down, and for a series of years been taunting us with such epithets as "tory" and "disunionist."
Admit the Hartford Convention to have been all that is said of it, the impartial historian will record on the same page, as being equally base and black, the Disunion meeting of the South Carolina Delegation.
If the gentlemen to whom this letter is addressed be not callous, they must feel sensibly the home thrusts of the writer. He is dignified, yet severe—he speaks plainly, yet elegantly. We hope the editors of papers in South Carolina will not neglect an article, which may open the eyes of some of their readers.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
Hartford Convention
Disunion
South Carolina Delegation
Southern Politicians
Sectional Tensions
Federalist Defense
What entities or persons were involved?
Hartford Convention
South Carolina Delegation
Southern Politicians
Boston Courier Writer
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Hartford Convention Against Southern Disunion Accusations
Stance / Tone
Critical Of Southern Disunionists, Supportive Of Northern Federalists
Key Figures
Hartford Convention
South Carolina Delegation
Southern Politicians
Boston Courier Writer
Key Arguments
Southern Disunion Projects Exceed Hartford Convention In Wickedness
Tables Turned On Those Who Accused Northerners Of Disunion
Impartial Historian Will Equate Southern Disunion Meeting With Hartford Convention's Alleged Baseness
Letter Is Dignified, Severe, Plain, And Elegant