Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Gazette Of The United States And Daily Evening Advertiser
Letter to Editor March 27, 1795

Gazette Of The United States And Daily Evening Advertiser

Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania

What is this article about?

A subscriber to the Gazette defends his prior observations on political resolutions against a splenetic reply, arguing that free discussion of differing sentiments benefits the public if conducted properly, and critiques the critic's disingenuous logic.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

For the Gazette of the United States.

MR. Fenno,

WHEN the observations made by a subscriber, in your paper of Tuesday, were written, nothing was more distant from the intentions of the author, than engaging in a controversy which must ultimately prove of little utility and might only terminate in personal invective. His object was merely to expose the disgraceful subterfuges which many will resort to, when in want of a proper object to ground their censorious remarks. The free discussion of a political sentiment, however different it may be from the popular opinion, if conducted with propriety, is certainly subservient to the public good: but people are apt to forget that when they pursue methods for the attainment of their purpose which are incompatible either with truth or the importance of the subject, they frequently, instead of giving additional strength, weaken the cause they mean to defend.

As these observations, however, have occasioned a splenetic reply from your correspondent, it may not be improper to advert to one of his remarks, which will certainly place his candour in a very enviable situation. As the business of importance was irrelative to the resolutions, he infers by a new kind of logick that the resolutions must have been supposed to be of no consequence.

But as this implication proceeds from a question, mutilated to serve his purpose of introducing a witticism immediately subsequent, its preposterousness and disingenuity must appear glaringly obvious on perusing the sentence which gave rise to his comment: the business of importance, only, for 'which the society was convened' is there mentioned as having no relation to the subject of his animadversions.

Subscriber

What sub-type of article is it?

Persuasive Political

What themes does it cover?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Political Sentiment Free Discussion Censorious Remarks Resolutions Disingenuity Public Good

What entities or persons were involved?

Subscriber Mr. Fenno

Letter to Editor Details

Author

Subscriber

Recipient

Mr. Fenno

Main Argument

the author defends his original observations exposing disingenuous political critiques and argues that proper, truthful discussion of differing sentiments strengthens public discourse, while critiquing the reply's mutilated logic and lack of candor.

Notable Details

New Kind Of Logick Mutilated Question Society Was Convened Business Of Importance Irrelative To The Resolutions

Are you sure?