Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
November 23, 1820
Kentucky Gazette
Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky
What is this article about?
Editorial republishes from Missouri Intelligencer on charges of cropping soldiers' ears; notes Secretary of War's order for Gen. Atkinson to investigate. Defends press's role in publicizing accusations against officials while allowing defenses, emphasizing watchfulness to protect rights under free institutions.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
MILITARY PUNISHMENTS.
We publish this day from the Missouri Intelligencer, an editorial article on charges made some months ago, in this paper against the practice of cropping soldiers' ears. We learn in addition to that article, that the secretary of war has ordered Gen. Henry Atkinson to institute an enquiry into the above cause of complaint. Should the enquiry conclude favorably, we shall most cheerfully give it to the public. It is a misfortune inseparably connected with our free institutions, that our officers, both civil and military, are very much exposed to accusations—nor do we see how it can be avoided, without restrictions on the liberty of speech and the liberty of the press, which would be much more dangerous than the licence now exercised. Every day's experience goes to confirm the doctrine, that the strictest watchfulness alone, can preserve our rights, and secure a people from the violation of laws by those appointed to administer them. Editors of Newspapers have but narrow limits assigned them in attempting to do justice between the accused and their accusers. Our profession seems to impose it upon us as an absolute duty, to give publicity to every well founded charge presented against men in office—and at the same time keep our columns open for defence.
We publish this day from the Missouri Intelligencer, an editorial article on charges made some months ago, in this paper against the practice of cropping soldiers' ears. We learn in addition to that article, that the secretary of war has ordered Gen. Henry Atkinson to institute an enquiry into the above cause of complaint. Should the enquiry conclude favorably, we shall most cheerfully give it to the public. It is a misfortune inseparably connected with our free institutions, that our officers, both civil and military, are very much exposed to accusations—nor do we see how it can be avoided, without restrictions on the liberty of speech and the liberty of the press, which would be much more dangerous than the licence now exercised. Every day's experience goes to confirm the doctrine, that the strictest watchfulness alone, can preserve our rights, and secure a people from the violation of laws by those appointed to administer them. Editors of Newspapers have but narrow limits assigned them in attempting to do justice between the accused and their accusers. Our profession seems to impose it upon us as an absolute duty, to give publicity to every well founded charge presented against men in office—and at the same time keep our columns open for defence.
What sub-type of article is it?
Military Affairs
Press Freedom
What keywords are associated?
Military Punishments
Ear Cropping
Press Duty
Officer Accountability
Free Institutions
What entities or persons were involved?
Missouri Intelligencer
Secretary Of War
Gen. Henry Atkinson
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Investigation Into Military Punishments Like Cropping Soldiers' Ears
Stance / Tone
Defensive Of Press Role In Exposing Official Misconduct
Key Figures
Missouri Intelligencer
Secretary Of War
Gen. Henry Atkinson
Key Arguments
Secretary Of War Ordered Enquiry Into Ear Cropping Practice
Press Must Publicize Well Founded Charges Against Officers
Free Institutions Expose Officials To Accusations
Watchfulness Preserves Rights From Law Violations By Administrators
Newspapers Have Duty To Balance Accusations And Defenses