Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Pulaski Citizen
Domestic News May 10, 1867

The Pulaski Citizen

Pulaski, Giles County, Tennessee

What is this article about?

The National Intelligencer advises Southern whites to participate in military-ordered elections and conventions under the new House bill, rather than abstain, to influence Reconstruction outcomes and avoid ceding control to those who vote, including negroes.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

What Shall the People of the South
Do?-The National Intelligencer thus answers this question:
"Whatever force there may have been in
the argument that the South could take
no action under the Sherman-Shellabarger
bill without voluntary participation in
its own degradation, is now destroyed by
the bill which passed the House of Representatives. That takes the question of
holding a convention out of the realm of
popular consent; and confers it upon the
military commander. He is enjoined to
make a registration and order an election;
whatever may be done, therefore, is done
under military duress, and it is the part of
wise men to accommodate themselves to
circumstances. The registration will be
made. The election will be held. The
negroes will vote. Shall the whites abstain? If inaction accomplished aught,
we might understand why men should advise it; but when the practical effect of inaction will be to secure the adoption of
State Constitutions by those who do act,
and an application for admission into the
Union from men who have voted, while
this inaction will put arguments into the
mouths of those opposed to our restoration, we cannot exactly see the wisdom of
hesitation. Those who now abstain from
choice will abstain hereafter from necessity."

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Military

What keywords are associated?

Reconstruction Southern Politics Military Elections Shellabarger Bill State Conventions

Where did it happen?

The South

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

The South

Outcome

participation advised to influence adoption of state constitutions and union admission; abstention would cede control to voters including negroes and hinder restoration.

Event Details

The National Intelligencer argues that the new House bill overrides prior concerns about the Sherman-Shellabarger bill by placing convention and election decisions under military command, making actions under duress; wise to accommodate by participating rather than abstaining, as inaction would allow others to shape constitutions and apply for Union readmission.

Are you sure?