When was it published?

February 9, 1910 in Bismarck Daily Tribune

Domestic News February 9, 1910

Bismarck Daily Tribune

Q: What entities or persons were involved?

Souder, Maddux & Rinker, A. B. Darelius, Turner & Wright, Hilbish, Southard, Bessie & Greer, Wm. Maloney, Webb, Wegglie, C. E. Wolfe, E. A. Palmer, John E. Greene, Mcgregor, Harm, H. A. Bronson, Skulason & Burtness, Houghton Implement Co., Vayrowski, Meyers & Meyers, E. R. Sinkler, Mayer Boot & Shoe Co., Ferguson, M. A. Hil

Q: What keywords are associated?

Supreme Court, Court Cases, Legal Arguments, Eddy County, Williams County, Grand Forks County, Walsh County, Cass County

Bismarck, Burleigh County, North Dakota

View full issue View on Library of Congress PDF Page 5

What is this article about?

The Supreme Court issues a call for arguments on eight cases next week, including Justice vs. Souder from Eddy County and others from Williams, Grand Forks, Walsh, and Cass counties, with listed attorneys for each side. No cases of more than ordinary interest scheduled.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

CALL FOR CASES BY THE SUPREME COURT

EIGHT CASES WILL BE BROUGHT UP FOR ARGUMENT NEXT WEEK.

No Cases of More Than Ordinary Interest Are Scheduled for the Coming Week.

The supreme court has issued a call for argument of cases commencing next week, as follows:

Wednesday, February 16.

Justice vs. Souder from Eddy county. Maddux & Rinker, and A. B. Darelius for defendant and appellant; Turner & Wright, contra.

Hilbish vs. Southard, from Williams county. Bessie & Greer, for plaintiff and appellant; Wm. Maloney, contra.

Webb vs. Wegglie, from Williams county. Bessie & Greer and C. E. Wolfe for plaintiff and appellants. E. A. Palmer and John E. Greene, contra.

Thursday, February 17.

McGregor vs. Harm, from Grand Forks county. H. A. Bronson, for plaintiff and appellant; Skulason & Burtness, contra.

Houghton Implement Co. vs. Vayrowski, from Walsh county. Skulason & Burtness, for plaintiff and appellant; Meyers & Meyers, and E. R. Sinkler, contra.

Mayer Boot & Shoe Co. vs. Ferguson, from Cass county. M. A. Hil

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Supreme Court Court Cases Legal Arguments Eddy County Williams County Grand Forks County Walsh County Cass County

What entities or persons were involved?

Souder Maddux & Rinker A. B. Darelius Turner & Wright Hilbish Southard Bessie & Greer Wm. Maloney Webb Wegglie C. E. Wolfe E. A. Palmer John E. Greene Mcgregor Harm H. A. Bronson Skulason & Burtness Houghton Implement Co. Vayrowski Meyers & Meyers E. R. Sinkler Mayer Boot & Shoe Co. Ferguson M. A. Hil

Domestic News Details

Event Date

Wednesday, February 16; Thursday, February 17

Key Persons

Souder Maddux & Rinker A. B. Darelius Turner & Wright Hilbish Southard Bessie & Greer Wm. Maloney Webb Wegglie C. E. Wolfe E. A. Palmer John E. Greene Mcgregor Harm H. A. Bronson Skulason & Burtness Houghton Implement Co. Vayrowski Meyers & Meyers E. R. Sinkler Mayer Boot & Shoe Co. Ferguson M. A. Hil

Event Details

The supreme court has issued a call for argument of cases commencing next week, as follows: Wednesday, February 16: Justice vs. Souder from Eddy county (Maddux & Rinker, and A. B. Darelius for defendant and appellant; Turner & Wright, contra); Hilbish vs. Southard, from Williams county (Bessie & Greer, for plaintiff and appellant; Wm. Maloney, contra); Webb vs. Wegglie, from Williams county (Bessie & Greer and C. E. Wolfe for plaintiff and appellants; E. A. Palmer and John E. Greene, contra). Thursday, February 17: McGregor vs. Harm, from Grand Forks county (H. A. Bronson, for plaintiff and appellant; Skulason & Burtness, contra); Houghton Implement Co. vs. Vayrowski, from Walsh county (Skulason & Burtness, for plaintiff and appellant; Meyers & Meyers, and E. R. Sinkler, contra); Mayer Boot & Shoe Co. vs. Ferguson, from Cass county (M. A. Hil