Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 26, 1871
The Morning Star And Catholic Messenger
New Orleans, Orleans County, Louisiana
What is this article about?
The editorial criticizes lay 'censors' who demand priests live ascetically and use parishioner funds solely for church needs, highlighting their hypocrisy as non-contributors who indulge in dissipation themselves.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The idea of such persons is that a priest is something extraordinary, that he is without the pale of the world, and that, consequently, he should not live in any respect as do the citizens of the world. Another objection made by those self-constituted censors is that a priest never has money which is properly his own, that all he possesses is merely the gift of his parishioners, that he is a mere trustee, and is accountable to his religious cestui que trusts for the manner in which he administers the trust reposed in him; that anything expended for any other purpose than for the necessary use of the Church is an improper conversion.
Our readers will find it to be an unexceptional rule that he, who is always so rigid in his exactions of the clergy, is himself given in no small degree to dissipation in more forms than one; that he who continually expressing his anxiety about the manner in which this priest or that priest is spending money, has never yet contributed a dollar to the fund which he alleges is being improperly used.
Our readers will find it to be an unexceptional rule that he, who is always so rigid in his exactions of the clergy, is himself given in no small degree to dissipation in more forms than one; that he who continually expressing his anxiety about the manner in which this priest or that priest is spending money, has never yet contributed a dollar to the fund which he alleges is being improperly used.
What sub-type of article is it?
Moral Or Religious
What keywords are associated?
Priest Criticism
Clergy Finances
Hypocrisy
Religious Trust
Lay Censors
Church Funds
What entities or persons were involved?
Priests
Self Constituted Censors
Parishioners
Clergy
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Hypocritical Criticism Of Priests' Lifestyles And Finances
Stance / Tone
Defensive Of Clergy, Accusatory Of Lay Critics' Hypocrisy
Key Figures
Priests
Self Constituted Censors
Parishioners
Clergy
Key Arguments
Priests Are Viewed By Critics As Extraordinary Figures Outside Worldly Norms, Unfit To Live Like Ordinary Citizens
Critics Argue Priests' Possessions Are Trusts From Parishioners, Accountable Only For Church Use
Expenditures Beyond Church Necessities Are Seen As Improper By These Censors
Critics Who Rigidly Demand From Clergy Are Themselves Dissipated And Non Contributory