Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Kentucky Gazette
Editorial January 22, 1816

Kentucky Gazette

Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky

What is this article about?

An editorial criticizes the U.S. Post Office for charging postage on letters delivered late or not at all, despite promises of timely service, especially as the Treasury Secretary proposes using it as a revenue source. It cites examples of delays and urges a law for justice to customers.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

THE POST OFFICE.

Says a Correspondent—Now, that the Secretary of the Treasury proposes to convert the Post Office department, which was originally established for public convenience, and to diffuse light and knowledge throughout the community, into a permanent source of revenue—it becomes more than ever the duty of the Press, to notice a species of swindling, practiced (we presume unintentionally,) by that department, ever since its commencement—we allude to the practice of charging postage on letters, &c. which have not been regularly transmitted and delivered, according to the engagements of the department, and in numerous cases, long after they have ceased to be of any use to their owners. In the transactions of private life, the laborer is only entitled to reward, according as he fulfills the terms of his contract. If A hires B to make a trip in a certain time to a certain place, and B is so dilatory on his journey as to make it immaterial to A whether he ever undertook it, or not, every child would say, that B forfeits all claim to compensation for his trouble. The principle is equally applicable to the Post Office. To say nothing of the injury which men of business suffer from the irregularities of the mail, there can be no just reason assigned for charging them with postage on letters, not regularly delivered, after those letters have ceased to be of any use to them. Were the Post Office the property of an honest man, he would not demand it, and the government cannot claim it on any other, than on a swindling principle. These remarks are at this time caused by some facts, which have come within our knowledge within the course of the last week. A citizen of this town, received since new-year, a letter from Columbia, S. C. where post mark was the 24th of August four months after it was put into the Post Office. Another received a letter from Frankfort in 8 days—and we have it from unquestionable authority, that the mail does not often convey letters, hence to Louisville in less than 8 days, though the P. M. General's proposals promise their delivery at that place in 48 hours—Therefore.

Mr. Secretary of the Treasury, whilst you are proposing to continue a tax, which tends to retard the progress of information throughout our republic, it is submitted to your consideration, whether a law should not be passed—

To make the Post Office do justice to its customers.

What sub-type of article is it?

Economic Policy Taxation Infrastructure

What keywords are associated?

Post Office Postage Charges Mail Delays Treasury Secretary Postal Revenue Government Swindling

What entities or persons were involved?

Secretary Of The Treasury Post Office Department P. M. General

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Criticism Of Post Office Inefficiencies And Unjust Postage Charges

Stance / Tone

Strongly Critical Of Post Office Practices And Revenue Proposals

Key Figures

Secretary Of The Treasury Post Office Department P. M. General

Key Arguments

Post Office Was Meant For Public Convenience, Not Revenue Charging Postage For Undelivered Or Late Letters Is Swindling Private Contract Principles Apply: No Fulfillment, No Payment Examples Of Delays: Letter From Columbia S.C. Took 4 Months, Frankfort 8 Days, Louisville Over 8 Days Vs. Promised 48 Hours Suggest Law To Ensure Post Office Justice To Customers

Are you sure?