Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Waterbury Evening Democrat
Waterbury, New Haven County, Connecticut
What is this article about?
In San Francisco, a writ of attachment was served on properties of Mrs. Oelrichs and Mrs. Vanderbilt in a $28,500 lawsuit against James G. Fair's heirs for breach of contract over John Seymour's employment. The levy aims to secure local jurisdiction.
Clipping
OCR Quality
Full Text
Mrs. Oelrichs and Mrs. Vanderbilt Mentioned in Writ.
San Francisco, Nov. 30.—A writ of attachment was served to-day on real estate belonging to Mrs. Hermann Oelrichs and Mrs. William K. Vanderbilt, Jr. The attachment is the result of a suit brought against the heirs of the late James G. Fair to recover $28,500 for an alleged breach of contract relating to the employment of John Seymour as superintendent of the Fair properties in this city. Seymour's attorney says the attachment was levied solely for the purpose of giving the local courts jurisdiction in the pending proceedings.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
San Francisco
Event Date
Nov. 30
Key Persons
Outcome
writ of attachment served on real estate to recover $28,500 for alleged breach of contract; levied for court jurisdiction.
Event Details
A writ of attachment was served on real estate belonging to Mrs. Hermann Oelrichs and Mrs. William K. Vanderbilt, Jr., as part of a suit against the heirs of the late James G. Fair. The suit seeks $28,500 for breach of contract related to John Seymour's employment as superintendent of the Fair properties in San Francisco. Seymour's attorney states the attachment was to establish local court jurisdiction.