Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeEdwardsville Spectator
Edwardsville, Madison County, Illinois
What is this article about?
Editorial in American Watchman defends General Jackson's military execution of Arbuthnot and Ambrister for instigating Native American massacres, criticizes opponents' predictions of British backlash, and notes the British House of Lords' decision vindicating the action.
OCR Quality
Full Text
One of the consequences of the execution of Arbuthnot and his fellow demon, predicted by those whom prejudice, accident, or various other causes, had enlisted against Jackson, was the indignation, if not the vengeance, of the British government; which, they triumphantly foretold, would demand the punishment of "the murderer of its subjects."
The decision of the house of lords, however, has put the question at rest. We think those vindictively humane and outrageously benevolent persons, who clamored for the sacrifice of Jackson, will feel not a little humbled and mortified at the perusal of Liverpool and Bathurst's remarks; and we hope they will form their opinions and calculations less precipitately in future, that they may avoid the like error and disappointment. American Watchman.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Domestic News Details
Key Persons
Outcome
execution of arbuthnot and ambrister by military law; british house of lords decision rests the question without demanding punishment of jackson.
Event Details
The text argues that the execution of Arbuthnot and Ambrister, who instigated savages to massacre, was justified despite controversy; opponents predicted British indignation, but the House of Lords' decision, via remarks by Liverpool and Bathurst, supports it.