Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Anaconda Standard
Anaconda, Deer Lodge County, Montana
What is this article about?
Explanation of the Democratic Party's two-thirds rule for presidential and vice-presidential nominations, referencing the 1876 St. Louis convention where an effort to switch to majority vote failed, leading to Tilden and Hendricks' nomination, and a ignored resolution for future change.
OCR Quality
Full Text
From the Cincinnati Enquirer.
In answer to many inquiries it is herewith stated that it will require a two-thirds vote in the forthcoming national democratic convention to nominate a candidate for either the presidency or the vice presidency. At the St. Louis convention, which nominated Mr. Tilden in 1876, there was an earnest effort to abolish this ancient rule and to substitute a majority vote. The sentiment of the convention was largely in favor of such a change, but it yielded to the claim that the delegates had been elected under the old rule and that therefore they ought to vote under the old rule—that it would be wrong to nominate, at that particular time, with less than a two-thirds vote. This claim, we repeat, was yielded to; and Mr. Tilden and Mr. Hendricks were nominated by two-thirds of the full vote of the convention. But a resolution was adopted asking that, thereafter, democratic national conventions should be called and conducted upon the basis of a majority vote. No attention was ever paid to this resolution, and the two-thirds rule still obtains.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Story Details
Key Persons
Location
St. Louis
Event Date
1876
Story Details
The two-thirds rule requires a two-thirds vote to nominate Democratic candidates for president or vice president. In 1876 at St. Louis, delegates nearly abolished it for a majority vote but retained it due to election under the old rule, nominating Tilden and Hendricks by two-thirds. A resolution for future majority voting was adopted but ignored, and the rule persists.