Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeNorfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger
Norfolk, Virginia
What is this article about?
In the U.S. Senate on December 23, 1805, a debate occurred on Dr. Logan's bill to suspend U.S. commercial intercourse with St. Domingo. Logan and Jackson supported it, while S. Smith, Hillhouse, Mitchell, and Adams opposed. The discussion highlighted foreign relations issues, including British orders, with consensus on defending U.S. rights. The bill was postponed to Monday.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Washington, December 23.
There was an interesting debate on Friday in the Senate on Dr. Logan's bill to suspend commercial intercourse between the United States and St. Domingo. Messrs. Logan and Jackson advocated, and Messrs. S. Smith, Hillhouse, Mitchell, and Adams opposed it. The debate became the more interesting from its implication of the general state of our foreign relations, and particularly the late British orders. No sentiment but that of reprobation was uttered, and the necessity of taking bold and commanding ground in defence of our violated rights was avowed on all hands. The further consideration of the bill was postponed till Monday. We shall endeavour to publish a sketch of the debate.
Nat. Intel.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Washington
Event Date
December 23
Key Persons
Outcome
the further consideration of the bill was postponed till monday.
Event Details
There was an interesting debate on Friday in the Senate on Dr. Logan's bill to suspend commercial intercourse between the United States and St. Domingo. Messrs. Logan and Jackson advocated, and Messrs. S. Smith, Hillhouse, Mitchell, and Adams opposed it. The debate became the more interesting from its implication of the general state of our foreign relations, and particularly the late British orders. No sentiment but that of reprobation was uttered, and the necessity of taking bold and commanding ground in defence of our violated rights was avowed on all hands.