Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger
Domestic News December 30, 1805

Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger

Norfolk, Virginia

What is this article about?

In the U.S. Senate on December 23, 1805, a debate occurred on Dr. Logan's bill to suspend U.S. commercial intercourse with St. Domingo. Logan and Jackson supported it, while S. Smith, Hillhouse, Mitchell, and Adams opposed. The discussion highlighted foreign relations issues, including British orders, with consensus on defending U.S. rights. The bill was postponed to Monday.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Lancaster, Dec. 17th, 1805.-

Washington, December 23.

There was an interesting debate on Friday in the Senate on Dr. Logan's bill to suspend commercial intercourse between the United States and St. Domingo. Messrs. Logan and Jackson advocated, and Messrs. S. Smith, Hillhouse, Mitchell, and Adams opposed it. The debate became the more interesting from its implication of the general state of our foreign relations, and particularly the late British orders. No sentiment but that of reprobation was uttered, and the necessity of taking bold and commanding ground in defence of our violated rights was avowed on all hands. The further consideration of the bill was postponed till Monday. We shall endeavour to publish a sketch of the debate.

Nat. Intel.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Senate Debate Logan Bill St Domingo Trade Foreign Relations British Orders

What entities or persons were involved?

Dr. Logan Logan Jackson S. Smith Hillhouse Mitchell Adams

Where did it happen?

Washington

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Washington

Event Date

December 23

Key Persons

Dr. Logan Logan Jackson S. Smith Hillhouse Mitchell Adams

Outcome

the further consideration of the bill was postponed till monday.

Event Details

There was an interesting debate on Friday in the Senate on Dr. Logan's bill to suspend commercial intercourse between the United States and St. Domingo. Messrs. Logan and Jackson advocated, and Messrs. S. Smith, Hillhouse, Mitchell, and Adams opposed it. The debate became the more interesting from its implication of the general state of our foreign relations, and particularly the late British orders. No sentiment but that of reprobation was uttered, and the necessity of taking bold and commanding ground in defence of our violated rights was avowed on all hands.

Are you sure?