Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
January 17, 1814
Virginia Argus
Richmond, Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial denounces opposition newspapers for fomenting resistance to the U.S. government's embargo, accusing them of factionalism, British influence, and risking civil war; defends the administration and constitutional principles, citing examples from Philadelphia's United States Gazette and a Southern British print.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
If there be a public cause, and true friends of liberty, can a genuine son of freedom & a votary of public good, view, without emotions of anguish and horror, the unprincipled attempts which are made by some of the opposition prints, to produce resistance to the government and laws. The taint of faction, and a base devotedness to the enemy, must poison the hearts of those who can countenance such daring strides in infamy. What infatuation and cruelty, for American editors, to evince, a disposition to accelerate the direful period of civil war! Is it not enough for these harpies of discord and toryism, that the blood of our fellow citizens shedding by the united hands of European and American savages? Will nothing satisfy their rampant thirst for power to manifest their hatred against the administration, but the miseries attendant on a civil war? Or are their threatenings of open pugnation to the embargo, the system of a former period, revived, of unprincipled manoeuvre, to defeat the great and salutary purposes of the government? If the energies of the country are to be crushed by such vipers; if we are to be driven by them from the latitude, in which the patriotism, manly wisdom, and calm resolution of a triumphant majority of Congress has placed us, then may public virtue retire from our councils, and suffer a further usurpation of illicit power! For our part, we had rather see the streets of Boston crimsoned, than the sacred principles of our constitution should be subverted by faction in aid of the views of a foreign enemy.
The editors of a depraved British semi-official print to the Southward, have declared, unconditionally, that the "Eastern people will not submit to the embargo!"
The editor of the "United States Gazette," of Philadelphia, after condemning, what many will approve, the officers who have left the army on our exposed frontier, proceeds with observing. "It is not very improbable, Mr. Madison may want a numerous gang of these gentry to enforce the embargo, and complete the destruction of our liberties; but we can assure Mr. Madison that unless he brings into action, more talents and firmness, he will not succeed in destroying the liberties of New England; there will be many affairs of a Bunker Hill nature, before he effects his purposes. They were born free and they will remain free, maugre all attempts of French dictation."
Thus it would appear, that this editor glories in the chance of seeing the standard of insurrection and revolt waving in triumph on Bunker's hill, in opposition to constitutional law.
Such degeneracy and profligate disaffection should be frowned into contempt and reprobation.—The editor who pens this, deems his native city disgraced, in the support and countenance given to such violence on national feeling, as the "United States Gazette" is in the constant habit of indulging in.
Balt. American.
The editors of a depraved British semi-official print to the Southward, have declared, unconditionally, that the "Eastern people will not submit to the embargo!"
The editor of the "United States Gazette," of Philadelphia, after condemning, what many will approve, the officers who have left the army on our exposed frontier, proceeds with observing. "It is not very improbable, Mr. Madison may want a numerous gang of these gentry to enforce the embargo, and complete the destruction of our liberties; but we can assure Mr. Madison that unless he brings into action, more talents and firmness, he will not succeed in destroying the liberties of New England; there will be many affairs of a Bunker Hill nature, before he effects his purposes. They were born free and they will remain free, maugre all attempts of French dictation."
Thus it would appear, that this editor glories in the chance of seeing the standard of insurrection and revolt waving in triumph on Bunker's hill, in opposition to constitutional law.
Such degeneracy and profligate disaffection should be frowned into contempt and reprobation.—The editor who pens this, deems his native city disgraced, in the support and countenance given to such violence on national feeling, as the "United States Gazette" is in the constant habit of indulging in.
Balt. American.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Economic Policy
Foreign Affairs
What keywords are associated?
Embargo Resistance
Factionalism
Civil War Threat
Pro Administration
British Influence
Constitutional Defense
What entities or persons were involved?
Opposition Prints
American Editors
United States Gazette
Mr. Madison
British Semi Official Print
Balt. American
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Opposition To The Embargo And Government
Stance / Tone
Strongly Pro Administration And Anti Faction
Key Figures
Opposition Prints
American Editors
United States Gazette
Mr. Madison
British Semi Official Print
Balt. American
Key Arguments
Opposition Prints Incite Resistance To Government And Laws, Risking Civil War.
Editors Show Factional Taint And Devotion To Foreign Enemy.
Threats Against Embargo Undermine Salutary Government Purposes.
Preference For Bloodshed Over Subverting Constitutional Principles.
Philadelphia's United States Gazette Glorifies Potential Insurrection Against Administration.
Such Disaffection Disgraces National Feeling.