Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Martinsburg Gazette And Public Advertiser
Domestic News April 5, 1832

Martinsburg Gazette And Public Advertiser

Martinsburg, Berkeley County, West Virginia

What is this article about?

Senate debate reveals rise in diplomatic expenses under Jackson from $286,500 (Adams era) to over $424,500 in 1830-31, with 1832 proposal at $236,150. Critics decry failed reforms, official purges, and outcry over Van Buren's Senate rejection.

Merged-components note: Table of diplomatic expenses directly relates to and precedes the article criticizing the Jackson administration's reforms; relabeled to domestic_news as it covers national political expenditures.

Clipping

OCR Quality

75% Good

Full Text

Two years of Mr. Adams,$286,500
For 1830,$214,500
For 1831,$210,000

The Reform.—One of the greatest objects of the Reformers who combined to put down the late pure and patriotic Administration, was avowed to be a reduction of the expenses of Diplomatic Intercourse. How far they have succeeded in this interesting and laudable purpose is seen very clearly in a few simple facts stated by Mr. Clayton, in a debate in the Senate on Wednesday last. We quote them as follows, without comment.

The expenses of Diplomatic Intercourse,
For 1828, $149,000
For 1829, 137,500
Two years of Gen. Jackson $424,500
Excess in 1830 and 1831, $138,000
The appropriation now proposed for the same expenditures, in the year 1832, is $236,150, wanting but fifty thousand dollars of the whole sum appropriated for similar purposes in both the years 1828 and 1829.

It is well remarked by the Indiana Free Press, that on the accession to power of the present ruling party in the Government, a system of proscription was deliberately commenced; that hundreds of honest and patriotic citizens were turned out because they did not vote for the successful candidate for the Presidency, and their places supplied by persons in many instances every way their inferiors. Foreign ministers were recalled without any pretence of just cause, and others sent out at an enormous expense to the country; and all these things were pronounced RIGHT "by the party." The only complaint from the most clamorous partisans, was that the REFORM did not go far enough. And now, says this straightforward Western Editor, when Mr. Van Buren, one of the elect, is rejected by the Senate of the United States, and that upon good grounds, too, (which can be said of few of the removals from office,) a general roar' is heard of 'treason,' 'corruption,' 'hellish plot,' &c. &c. from one end of the republic to the other! Are the people blind, (he adds) or do they not wish to see? —Nat Int.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics Economic

What keywords are associated?

Diplomatic Expenses Senate Debate Government Reform Political Proscription Van Buren Rejection

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Adams Gen. Jackson Mr. Clayton Mr. Van Buren

Domestic News Details

Event Date

1832

Key Persons

Mr. Adams Gen. Jackson Mr. Clayton Mr. Van Buren

Event Details

Debate in the Senate on diplomatic intercourse expenses, highlighting increases under Jackson administration compared to Adams, with proposed 1832 appropriation of $236,150. Commentary on reform failures, proscription of officials, and rejection of Van Buren.

Are you sure?