Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The New Hampshire Gazette
Domestic News January 29, 1828

The New Hampshire Gazette

Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire

What is this article about?

The Worcester National Aegis misrepresented a toast by Mr. Desha at the Washington celebration on the eighth, implying he originated insulting language, but he was retorting Mr. Brent's epithets against Gen. Jackson from Brent's letter to Mr. Clay. The response defends Desha's action as justified by common sense.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

The Worcester National Aegis gives the toast of Mr. Desha, given at the celebration of the eighth, at Washington, without quotations, or giving any clue whereby its allusion may be fully ascertained, evidently intending to convey an idea, that the insulting language originated with Mr. Desha, when in fact, he merely retorted on Mr. Brent his own words, which he applied to Gen. Jackson in his letter to Mr. Clay. We pretend to no knowledge of the laws of duelling, but the laws of common sense would seem to justify any man in repelling a vile calumny, uttered against his friend, especially when that friend is placed in a situation (as Gen. Jackson now is, in relation to the public) which renders it impossible for him to resent it in person. We think Mr. Brent, seeing he first threw out those slanderous and unbecoming epithets, richly deserved the retort.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Desha Toast Brent Retort Jackson Calumny Worcester Aegis Political Slander

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Desha Mr. Brent Gen. Jackson Mr. Clay

Where did it happen?

Washington

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Washington

Event Date

The Eighth

Key Persons

Mr. Desha Mr. Brent Gen. Jackson Mr. Clay

Event Details

The Worcester National Aegis reported Mr. Desha's toast at the Washington celebration without context, suggesting he originated insulting language, but he retorted Mr. Brent's words applied to Gen. Jackson in Brent's letter to Mr. Clay. The piece defends the retort as justified against calumny, given Jackson's public position preventing personal response, and states Brent deserved it for initiating the epithets.

Are you sure?