Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Union Times
Story July 5, 1947

The Union Times

New Haven, New Haven County, Connecticut

What is this article about?

Gerard D. Reilly, former NLRB member, speaks at a printing industry luncheon in Washington on the Taft-Hartley Act, claiming it retains Wagner Act features and advising on charging the International Typographical Union with unfair practices if they push closed shop agreements without contracts.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Gerard Reilly Still Talking

WASHINGTON-(FP)- Gerard D. Reilly, former member of the NLRB who went sour on organized labor even before he helped draft the Taft-Hartley slave labor law, believes the new act retains "the central features of the Wagner act."

Speaking before a printing industry luncheon, Reilly said "there is danger of a certain amount of lawlessness which will discredit the objectives of the bill."

Reilly then got down to real business when he advised the industrial relations section of the group that they could charge the Intl. Typographical Union with refusing to bargain if the ITU should try to make closed shop agreements without benefit of contract.

The former liberal said newspapers could not stop a strike to enforce a contract making printing foremen be members of the ITU, but that the union could not force the employer to sign such a contract without being guilty of unfair labor practice under the Taft-Hartley act.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Justice

What keywords are associated?

Taft Hartley Act Labor Law Unions Gerard Reilly Printing Industry Closed Shop

What entities or persons were involved?

Gerard D. Reilly Intl. Typographical Union

Where did it happen?

Washington

Story Details

Key Persons

Gerard D. Reilly Intl. Typographical Union

Location

Washington

Story Details

Gerard D. Reilly advises printing industry on Taft-Hartley Act implications for union bargaining, closed shops, and strikes involving the International Typographical Union.

Are you sure?