Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
November 12, 1788
The New Hampshire Gazette And General Advertiser
Portsmouth, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
This Boston editorial praises Connecticut's selection of capable federal senators who represent broad interests and are fit for national roles. It condemns electing anti-Constitution members and argues precedents are insignificant compared to the people's will and the new federal system.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
BOSTON, November 8.
The liberality of the choice of Federal Senators in Connecticut, and the wisdom which has dictated it, exhibit an example and furnish a lesson to all the sister States, highly worthy of their imitation. Fettered by no narrow system of individual interests, the wise people have deputed two gentlemen as their representatives in that august assembly, whose general knowledge and extensive information will equally embrace all interests—whose powerful talents will enable them to advocate, at once, the claims of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures—whose professional skill is prepared to combat the subtle, or to reason with the liberal minded; and whose political acquirements qualify them to negotiate with the ablest statesman in Europe—The Representatives of a State, not merely of a plough or a ship.
The idea of introducing men into the federal Legislature to administer a Constitution which they are known to be pointedly opposed to, is so absurd, that it meets with universal contempt from the federal electors of this metropolis.
As much as has been said about PRECEDENTS of late, it may not be impertinent to advert to the fate of those bugbears, these formidable nothings all, and since the revolution. Pray what attention was paid to them in throwing off our allegiance to the King of Britain? Where did we find a precedent for the wisdom and patriotism in forming our constitution? Existing and established laws are confessedly of more validity than precedents.—But did the old Confederation weigh a straw in the minds of the late Continental Convention who framed the glorious Federal Constitution? Precedents are formidable, when they will answer the purposes of party—but the good sense of our country has demonstrated, that when they come in competition with the interests of the people "they vanish into air, into thin air."
The liberality of the choice of Federal Senators in Connecticut, and the wisdom which has dictated it, exhibit an example and furnish a lesson to all the sister States, highly worthy of their imitation. Fettered by no narrow system of individual interests, the wise people have deputed two gentlemen as their representatives in that august assembly, whose general knowledge and extensive information will equally embrace all interests—whose powerful talents will enable them to advocate, at once, the claims of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures—whose professional skill is prepared to combat the subtle, or to reason with the liberal minded; and whose political acquirements qualify them to negotiate with the ablest statesman in Europe—The Representatives of a State, not merely of a plough or a ship.
The idea of introducing men into the federal Legislature to administer a Constitution which they are known to be pointedly opposed to, is so absurd, that it meets with universal contempt from the federal electors of this metropolis.
As much as has been said about PRECEDENTS of late, it may not be impertinent to advert to the fate of those bugbears, these formidable nothings all, and since the revolution. Pray what attention was paid to them in throwing off our allegiance to the King of Britain? Where did we find a precedent for the wisdom and patriotism in forming our constitution? Existing and established laws are confessedly of more validity than precedents.—But did the old Confederation weigh a straw in the minds of the late Continental Convention who framed the glorious Federal Constitution? Precedents are formidable, when they will answer the purposes of party—but the good sense of our country has demonstrated, that when they come in competition with the interests of the people "they vanish into air, into thin air."
What sub-type of article is it?
Constitutional
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Federal Senators
Connecticut Election
Constitutional Support
Precedents Dismissal
Federalist Advocacy
What entities or persons were involved?
Federal Senators From Connecticut
Federal Electors
Continental Convention
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Praise For Connecticut's Federal Senators And Dismissal Of Anti Federal Precedents
Stance / Tone
Strongly Pro Federalist And Dismissive Of Constitutional Opposition
Key Figures
Federal Senators From Connecticut
Federal Electors
Continental Convention
Key Arguments
Connecticut's Choice Of Senators Demonstrates Wisdom And Liberality, Representing All State Interests
Chosen Senators Possess General Knowledge, Talents For Agriculture, Commerce, Manufactures, And International Negotiation
Idea Of Electing Opponents To The Constitution Is Absurd And Contemptible
Precedents Were Ignored In Breaking Allegiance To Britain And Forming The Federal Constitution
Old Confederation Held No Weight Against The New Federal System
Precedents Only Matter When Serving Party Interests, But Vanish Against People's Interests