Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Alexandria Gazette
Domestic News December 22, 1909

Alexandria Gazette

Alexandria, Alexandria County, District Of Columbia

What is this article about?

Arguments began yesterday in U.S. District Court in Norfolk before Judge Waddill in the case of Jamestown Exposition Company receivers suing over 1,300 delinquent stock subscribers. Defense challenged collective suing, court jurisdiction, and receivers' right to sue before asset insufficiency determination. Proceedings ongoing at adjournment.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

JAMESTOWN SUITS ARGUED

Argument in the case of the receivers of the Jamestown Exposition Company against upward of 1,300 subscribers to exposition stock, alleged to be delinquent in payment, was yesterday commenced before Judge Waddill in the United States court at Norfolk.

The right of the receivers to sue the subscribers collectively instead of individually at common law was denied by attorneys for the defense, the jurisdiction of the United States court was demurred to and finally it was argued that the receivers have no right to sue until it may be found that the assets of the company are not sufficient to meet its liabilities. Argument was still in progress when court adjourned.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Jamestown Exposition Stock Subscribers Delinquent Payments Court Argument Norfolk Court Judge Waddill

What entities or persons were involved?

Judge Waddill

Where did it happen?

Norfolk

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Norfolk

Event Date

Yesterday

Key Persons

Judge Waddill

Outcome

argument in progress when court adjourned

Event Details

Argument in the case of the receivers of the Jamestown Exposition Company against upward of 1,300 subscribers to exposition stock, alleged to be delinquent in payment, was commenced before Judge Waddill in the United States court at Norfolk. The right of the receivers to sue the subscribers collectively instead of individually at common law was denied by attorneys for the defense, the jurisdiction of the United States court was demurred to and finally it was argued that the receivers have no right to sue until it may be found that the assets of the company are not sufficient to meet its liabilities.

Are you sure?