Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Letter to Editor
August 21, 1793
Gazette Of The United States
New York, New York County, New York
What is this article about?
A correspondent criticizes a newspaper for describing France's annulment of a decree violating the US-France treaty as 'generosity' rather than justice, questioning republican honor and the faith of nations among those who emphasize treaty obligations.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
Says a Correspondent,
We have heard of a Decree of the National Convention of France, of the 9th May, evidently violating an essential article of the treaty between France and the United States. That such a Decree was passed, there can be no doubt, as the consequences have been experienced by the commercial interests of this country. But it is now said (from what authority does not appear, as neither the Executive of the Union, or the Minister of France, have announced the fact) that a Decree of the 23d May has annulled the Decree of the 9th, so far as it contravenes the treaty with the United States. However, on the bare supposition that this may be the case, a paragraphist in Mr. Dunlap's paper of Monday, puffs off the transaction as an instance of the "generosity" of France, and as sacrificing the interest of that republic for their American brethren—These are mere flourishes—for if to be just in the fulfilment of treaties, is to be generous, what becomes of the faith of nations, and that boasted superiority of republican honor, over that of monarchical ?—The truth is, that those who have made the greatest clamour about the sacredness of the obligations America is under to fulfil its treaties with France, are the first to annihilate those obligations, by extolling an act of justice, if it has really taken place, as an act of generosity. By this we may see what ideas some persons entertain of the faith of nations.
We have heard of a Decree of the National Convention of France, of the 9th May, evidently violating an essential article of the treaty between France and the United States. That such a Decree was passed, there can be no doubt, as the consequences have been experienced by the commercial interests of this country. But it is now said (from what authority does not appear, as neither the Executive of the Union, or the Minister of France, have announced the fact) that a Decree of the 23d May has annulled the Decree of the 9th, so far as it contravenes the treaty with the United States. However, on the bare supposition that this may be the case, a paragraphist in Mr. Dunlap's paper of Monday, puffs off the transaction as an instance of the "generosity" of France, and as sacrificing the interest of that republic for their American brethren—These are mere flourishes—for if to be just in the fulfilment of treaties, is to be generous, what becomes of the faith of nations, and that boasted superiority of republican honor, over that of monarchical ?—The truth is, that those who have made the greatest clamour about the sacredness of the obligations America is under to fulfil its treaties with France, are the first to annihilate those obligations, by extolling an act of justice, if it has really taken place, as an act of generosity. By this we may see what ideas some persons entertain of the faith of nations.
What sub-type of article is it?
Persuasive
Political
What themes does it cover?
Politics
What keywords are associated?
France Decree
Us Treaty
National Faith
Republican Honor
Treaty Obligations
What entities or persons were involved?
A Correspondent
Letter to Editor Details
Author
A Correspondent
Main Argument
criticizes portraying france's annulment of a treaty-violating decree as generosity instead of justice, undermining the concept of national faith and republican honor.
Notable Details
Decree Of 9th May Violating Us France Treaty
Decree Of 23d May Annulling It
Reference To Mr. Dunlap's Paper
Questions Superiority Of Republican Over Monarchical Honor