Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Kentucky Gazette
Editorial June 27, 1836

Kentucky Gazette

Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky

What is this article about?

Editorial sarcastically notes the Intelligencer and 'C.' approving Gen. Jackson's veto of a bill limiting Congress sessions, contrasting past opposition to the veto power. Critiques Commonwealth's remarks on Chambers-Cass correspondence as unflattering to its party.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Is there nothing new under the sun?

The Intelligencer, and even 'C. of the Intelligencer,' has approved of one act of Gen. Jackson! and that not the exercise of the veto power!! Who, who has read the Intelligencer for the last few years, would have expected that print, and especially under that signature, to have given its sanction to any act of General Jackson's? If our recollection does not deceive us, the Intelligencer has been vehement for withholding the veto power from the President—yet, in that paper of Friday last, is the following compliment to the President, and reprimand to Congress.

"The President has vetoed a bill limiting the length of future sessions of Congress. We are inclined to the opinion that the veto power has been here correctly applied. Hasty legislation had made a turbulent and headstrong Congress do a foolishly improper and unconstitutional thing, and the palpable error has met its proper remedy. C."

The introductory remarks of the Commonwealth to the correspondence between Col. G. W. Chambers and Mr. Secretary Cass, we should consider anything else than complimentary to its own party. We can only understand the latter clause as either admitting that no volunteers were to have been expected from that party, or that it was the practice of "fighting against truth, common sense, and the common interest of the country."

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Constitutional

What keywords are associated?

Jackson Veto Intelligencer Approval Congress Sessions Partisan Press Veto Power

What entities or persons were involved?

Gen. Jackson Intelligencer C. Of The Intelligencer Col. G. W. Chambers Mr. Secretary Cass Commonwealth

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Unexpected Approval Of Jackson's Veto By Opposition Press

Stance / Tone

Sarcastic Criticism

Key Figures

Gen. Jackson Intelligencer C. Of The Intelligencer Col. G. W. Chambers Mr. Secretary Cass Commonwealth

Key Arguments

Intelligencer Unexpectedly Approves Jackson's Veto On Bill Limiting Congress Sessions Intelligencer Previously Opposed Veto Power Quote Praises Veto As Correct Application Against Hasty, Unconstitutional Legislation Commonwealth's Remarks Imply Party Reluctance For Volunteers Or Opposition To National Interest

Are you sure?