Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Ripley County Democrat
Editorial August 25, 1911

Ripley County Democrat

Doniphan, Ripley County, Missouri

What is this article about?

Editorial questions why the State Department required artist Albert Rosenthal to receipt for $2,450 for a portrait of Justice Day when he received only $850, suggesting the $1,600 difference was smuggled from an undisclosed emergency fund, despite no evidence of embezzlement by the former chief clerk, as indicated by Secretaries Knox and Root.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Explanation Seemed Called For.

The attitude of Secretaries Knox and Root indicate that a former chief clerk of the department of state did not pocket the difference between the $850 that Albert Rosenthal got for his painting of Justice Day and the $2,450 he had to receipt for. But why should the department have required him to receipt for the larger sum? It has an emergency fund, the application of which it is not obliged to disclose; why, then, should it have smuggled an item of $1,600 into the payment for a portrait?

What sub-type of article is it?

Economic Policy

What keywords are associated?

State Department Portrait Payment Emergency Fund Knox Root Rosenthal Embezzlement

What entities or persons were involved?

Secretaries Knox And Root Albert Rosenthal Justice Day Department Of State Former Chief Clerk

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Questioning State Department Portrait Payment Procedures

Stance / Tone

Critical Inquiry Into Fiscal Handling

Key Figures

Secretaries Knox And Root Albert Rosenthal Justice Day Department Of State Former Chief Clerk

Key Arguments

Attitude Of Knox And Root Suggests No Embezzlement By Chief Clerk Discrepancy Between $850 Paid And $2,450 Receipted Department Required Receipt For Larger Sum Unnecessarily Emergency Fund Exists For Undisclosed Uses Questioning Smuggling $1,600 Into Portrait Payment

Are you sure?