Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Daily Press And Dakotaian
Domestic News January 7, 1880

Daily Press And Dakotaian

Yankton, Yankton County, South Dakota

What is this article about?

In a US Supreme Court hearing on the Arkansas canon case, the Denver & Rio Grande Railway Company prevailed over the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, securing an early date for their mandamus application to enforce an April decree without payment conditions, against Judge Hallet.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Last Monday, after a sharp struggle about the Arkansas canon case before the United States supreme court between the Denver & Rio Grande railway company and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railway company, the former company succeeded in getting an early day appointed for hearing their application for a mandamus to compel Judge Hallet to execute the decree of the supreme court of last April without the condition of payment for the work done by the last named company or any other condition whatever.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Supreme Court Arkansas Canon Case Railway Companies Mandamus Judge Hallet

What entities or persons were involved?

Judge Hallet Denver & Rio Grande Railway Company Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company

Domestic News Details

Event Date

Last Monday

Key Persons

Judge Hallet Denver & Rio Grande Railway Company Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company

Outcome

the denver & rio grande railway company succeeded in getting an early day appointed for hearing their application for a mandamus.

Event Details

After a sharp struggle about the Arkansas canon case before the United States supreme court between the Denver & Rio Grande railway company and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railway company, the former company succeeded in getting an early day appointed for hearing their application for a mandamus to compel Judge Hallet to execute the decree of the supreme court of last April without the condition of payment for the work done by the last named company or any other condition whatever.

Are you sure?