Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeAlexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial & Political
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
British new order in council partially abrogates 1807 orders, exempting some trade, in response to US non-intercourse law. US reactions mixed; Madison's proclamation based on anticipated full revocation via negotiations with envoy. London papers and merchants satisfied, but Democrats condemn it.
OCR Quality
Full Text
PARTIAL ABROGATION OF THE ORDERS
IN COUNCIL.
The new order in council was issued after a communication of our non-intercourse law, and in all probability with a view to induce its abrogation as to G. Britain. The London papers state, that Mr. Pinkney as well as the American merchants are satisfied with it. But our democrats openly and loudly condemn it; accordingly their celebrations at New York, which were intended for the 10th of June, were by public notices laid aside after the arrival of the Pacific. In what point of view the matter will be regarded at Washington a day or two will shew.
The new order in council interdicts no trade, that a fair interpretation of our laws does not equally interdict; and it is not even so extensively prohibitory; for the Hanstowns and the kingdom of Italy are exempt from their interdict. Meanwhile, it is manifest that a pure and simple revocation of the orders of Jan. and Nov. 1807 was not meant as the foundation of Mr. Madison's proclamation. This conclusion we draw from Mr. Erskine's letter to Mr. Smith of 18th April [No. 3] in which after stating the change which had taken place by the accommodation of the Chesapeake affair, he communicates the intention of the British government to send an envoy extraordinary, and proceeds to say: "His majesty would be willing to withdraw his orders in council of Jan. and Nov. 1807, so far as respects the U. States, in the persuasion, that the president would issue a proclamation for the renewal of the intercourse with G. Britain, and that whatever difference of opinion should arise in the interpretation of the terms of such an agreement will be removed in the proposed negociation."
Here is a latitude taken by the British envoy which is acquiesced in by our executive.
The conclusion is in our view undeniable, that this new regulation discloses only a transient state of things, which is subject to revision and change on the arrival of the envoy extraordinary, who may be shortly expected. At any rate we have above exhibited a convincing evidence, that when the proclamation was issued, no agreement had been made as to the terms and details of the abrogation of the former orders in council.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Foreign News Details
Primary Location
G. Britain
Event Date
18th April
Key Persons
Outcome
partial abrogation of orders in council of jan. and nov. 1807; exemptions for hanstowns and kingdom of italy; anticipated full revocation via negotiations; mixed us reactions with democrats condemning.
Event Details
New British order in council issued after US non-intercourse law communication, aiming to induce its abrogation regarding Great Britain. London papers report satisfaction from Mr. Pinkney and American merchants. US Democrats condemn it, canceling New York celebrations post-Pacific arrival. Order interdicts less trade than US laws; based on Mr. Erskine's letter offering conditional withdrawal tied to US proclamation renewal and future negotiations with envoy extraordinary. Seen as temporary, pending envoy's arrival.