Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeTwin City Observer
Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Hennepin County, Ramsey County, Minnesota
What is this article about?
The St. Paul Branch of the NAACP denounced the Minnesota State Fair Employment Practices Commission's attempt to amend the state law to allow employers to require photographs of job applicants before interviews, criticizing the lack of consultation with other civil rights organizations.
Merged-components note: Continuation of FEPC law story from page 1 to page 3.
OCR Quality
Full Text
The St. Paul Branch of the NAACP passed a motion at their regular membership meeting Sunday, April 12th, denouncing the action by the Minnesota State Fair Employment Practices Commission in seeking an amendment to the State Fair Employment Practices Law, making it permissible for employers to require photographs of applicants prior to holding interviews.
Leonard Carter, Branch President
FEPC...
(Continued from Page 1)
President stated: "This is the first time any of the human relations organizations or commissions have sought to alter a state measure dealing with civil rights without contacting the other interested organizations. Furthermore, Mr. Carter stated that the House Committee labelling this measure as non-controversial was ridiculous and only a result of the other interested bodies not having prior knowledge of the proposed amendment. Mr. Carter concluded that he seriously hoped in the future Mr. Leland, Executive Director, of the State Fair Employment Practices Commission, would at least contact the other interested organizations prior to initiating any measures to change the State Laws."
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Story Details
Key Persons
Location
St. Paul, Minnesota
Event Date
Sunday, April 12th
Story Details
The St. Paul Branch of the NAACP passed a motion denouncing the FEPC's attempt to amend the state law to permit employers to require photographs from applicants before interviews, criticizing the lack of consultation and the House Committee's labeling of the measure as non-controversial.