Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 30, 1815
Alexandria Gazette, Commercial And Political
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
An editorial from the Raleigh Minerva criticizes William Cobbett's profligate and false writings, which Democratic editors publish uncritically. It refutes Cobbett's comparison of John Adams (who profited from office) and Timothy Pickering (who was impoverished and frugal in service).
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
some of the beautiful sayings of Mr. Cobbett while in the United States. He is now very fond of the same democrats he used then to revile and they, not to be outdone, are equally fond of him! Notoriously profligate as are the principles of the man; impudent, malicious and abominable, his aberrations from truth, weekly and daily do the democratic editors stuff their columns with his writings: This I should not blame them for, if it were done for the mere gratification of their readers, accompanied with the proper cautions against believing him. Cobbett is an amusing though an abandoned writer. But they suffer all his falsities to pass without contradiction; nay, they even countenance and encourage a belief in them. One of these I shall notice. Comparing Mr. Adams and Mr. Pickering, he says "Mr. Adams sought only the good of his country; Mr. Pickering, his own advancement and private emolument." Now Cobbett and his friends know this to be palpably untrue. Mr. Adams has enriched himself by his various offices, whereas Mr. Pickering has been impoverished in his public career; and the first is as notoriously ostentatious and proud, as the second is plain and frugal.
Raleigh Minerva.
Raleigh Minerva.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Cobbett
Adams
Pickering
Democrats
Political Falsities
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Cobbett
Mr. Adams
Mr. Pickering
Democratic Editors
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of William Cobbett's False Claims About John Adams And Timothy Pickering
Stance / Tone
Critical Of Cobbett And Democratic Editors, Defensive Of Pickering
Key Figures
Mr. Cobbett
Mr. Adams
Mr. Pickering
Democratic Editors
Key Arguments
Cobbett Now Fond Of Democrats He Once Reviled, And Vice Versa
Democratic Editors Publish Cobbett's Writings Without Caution Or Contradiction
Cobbett Falsely Claims Adams Sought Only Country's Good While Pickering Sought Personal Advancement
Adams Enriched Himself Through Offices, While Pickering Was Impoverished In Public Service
Adams Is Ostentatious And Proud, Pickering Plain And Frugal