Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Islander
Foreign News January 9, 1896

The Islander

Friday Harbor, San Juan County, Washington

What is this article about?

Hon. John A. Kasson, ex-minister to Germany, critiques European powers' interventions to maintain balance of power in Europe and Asia, ignoring international law, and notes a similar American principle against European interference in the Americas. (1896)

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

THURSDAY, JANUARY 9th, 1896.

Hon. John A. Kasson, ex-minister to Germany, recently furnished some questions and answers which are interesting. He said: "There is no principle of 'international law' that authorizes any great power of Europe to interfere between two nations, one of which seizes territory from another. Yet they continually do it. They say they have a right to prevent a disturbance of the 'balance of power' in Europe. They have lately extended it to Asia. Under what authority of 'international law' did England deprive Russia of land she conquered from Turkey? What rule justified Russia in the denial to Japan of the territorial fruits of her victory? Under what rule of law did England and France deny to Russia even the right to have a fleet in the Black sea? The answer is that there has grown up among European governments a sort of common law quite outside of the international code. England's prime minister is hardly justified in expressing surprise that there has grown up and developed among us a similar common law against a disturbance of our American balance by European intervention."

What sub-type of article is it?

Diplomatic Political

What keywords are associated?

International Law Balance Of Power European Intervention American Balance Territorial Seizures

What entities or persons were involved?

Hon. John A. Kasson

Where did it happen?

Europe

Foreign News Details

Primary Location

Europe

Event Date

1896 01 09

Key Persons

Hon. John A. Kasson

Event Details

Hon. John A. Kasson states there is no international law authorizing European powers to interfere in territorial seizures to maintain balance of power, yet they do so in Europe and now Asia. He questions specific historical interventions by England against Russia, Russia against Japan, and England/France against Russia in the Black Sea, attributing it to a common law outside international code. He argues England's prime minister should not be surprised at America's similar principle against European intervention in the American balance.

Are you sure?