Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
The National Intelligencer And Washington Advertiser
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
In a recent British House of Commons speech, Mr. Stephens, author of 'War in Disguise,' remarked that even the British party in America had not boldly misrepresented the true impact of the Berlin Decree on trade, unlike Mr. Pickering's defense of the British cause. This and other statements indicate the British ministry justly claims the Junto Federalists as their own.
Clipping
OCR Quality
Full Text
"It has made use of this artifice. It might be alleged that our trade has managed from the Berlin decree even the British party in America had not been bold enough in the use of such open and continued misrepresentation, to state how the fact really was—Mr. Pickering, who had so ably and justly defended the British cause, had not stated it."
From this, and various other expressions used by the British ministry and their supporters, there can remain no question on the mind of any impartial or disinterested man, that they claim, and claim justly, the whole clan of Junto Federalists as their own.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Foreign News Details
Primary Location
British House Of Commons
Event Date
A Late Speech
Key Persons
Outcome
british ministry claims the junto federalists as their own
Event Details
Mr. Stephens in a speech criticized the lack of bold misrepresentation by the British party in America regarding the Berlin Decree's impact on trade, noting Mr. Pickering did not fully state the facts in defending the British cause.