Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Richmond Enquirer
Editorial July 24, 1821

Richmond Enquirer

Richmond, Richmond County, Virginia

What is this article about?

Anecdote from Dr. Franklin opposing property qualifications for voting: a man loses his vote when his $50 jackass dies, despite gaining more experience, questioning if the right is in the man or the jackass.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

ELECTIVE FRANCHISE.

Dr. Franklin was once a member of a body in which it was contended that a certain amount of property should be required as a qualification for voting. The Doctor was opposed to it: "To day," said he, "a man owns a Jackass worth 50 dollars, and he is entitled to vote: but before the next election, the Jackass dies.—The man in the mean time, has become more experienced; his knowledge of the principles of government, and his acquaintance with mankind, are more extensive; and he is therefore better qualified to make a proper selection of rulers—but the Jackass is dead and the man cannot vote. Now, gentlemen, said he, addressing himself to the advocates of the qualification, "pray inform me, in whom is the right of suffrage, in the man—or in the Jackass?"

What sub-type of article is it?

Suffrage

What keywords are associated?

Elective Franchise Voting Qualifications Property Requirement Benjamin Franklin Suffrage Rights

What entities or persons were involved?

Dr. Franklin

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Opposition To Property Qualifications For Voting

Stance / Tone

Opposed To Property Requirements For Suffrage

Key Figures

Dr. Franklin

Key Arguments

A Man's Right To Vote Should Not Depend On Owning Property, As Experience Improves Judgment Regardless Of Wealth. The Anecdote Of The Jackass Illustrates That Suffrage Resides In The Individual, Not Their Possessions.

Are you sure?