Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeMineral Point Tribune
Mineral Point, Iowa County, Wisconsin
What is this article about?
Madison report on March 4, 1879, predicts Wisconsin Legislature adjournment around March 7; details Senate defeats of biennial sessions proposition, prohibition resolution (20-10 vote), interest bill, and employees' salaries reduction bill; criticizes Senators Hathaway and Loper for absence; defends comments on Cothren's Democratic nomination.
OCR Quality
Full Text
MADISON, March 4th, 1879.
My prediction as to the time of adjournment of the Legislature will be verified; the session will not close until about Friday the 7th, though but little now remains to be done. Biennial sessions, prohibition and the interest bill, all have met their death the past week in the Senate. Senator Price made a gallant fight for the temperance people, but in vain, the resolution being killed by a vote of 20 to 10. The biennial sessions proposition was beaten not so much by its avowed opponents as by the treachery of its pretended friends. It first appeared in the Senate as an Assembly resolution for concurrence, when it lacked only one of the required number of votes, and when two pretended friends of the measure were conspicuously absent, viz: Hathaway of Grant, and Loper of Fond du Lac. These Senators were in the city at the time, and had they been as earnest in support of the measure as was expected, they would not have failed to be on hand at the time when all recognized its fate to be practically determined. Their votes recorded in favor of it subsequently could have no more effect than the Pope's bull against the comet. An explanation from these Senators to their constituents is in order. The interest bill never had a ghost of a chance to pass the Senate, and no one was surprised at its summary death at the hands of that body. The reduction of employees' salaries bill, which excited considerable interest about the Capital, and which was disposed of on a point of order, might have met more favor and fared better but for the fact that its special champions, Price, Hathaway and Loper, having relatives and friends in the list of Legislative employees, carefully avoided making any provision that would affect them. I notice that the Democrat regards my comments upon Cothren's nomination by the Democratic caucus as an "attack" upon the Judge and his friends. If any intelligent Republican reader of the TRIBUNE will admit over his own signature that he so regards my reference to the matter, I will make all haste to correct him, but the opinions of Republicans who complain to or through the Democrat, I do not regard as calling for recognition.
W. H. B.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Madison
Event Date
March 4th, 1879
Key Persons
Outcome
biennial sessions proposition defeated due to absence of supporters; prohibition resolution killed 20-10; interest bill failed in senate; reduction of employees' salaries bill dismissed on point of order.
Event Details
Legislature session predicted to adjourn around March 7; past week saw Senate defeats of biennial sessions, prohibition, and interest bill; Senator Price fought for prohibition but lost; biennial sessions lacked votes partly due to absent Senators Hathaway and Loper; salaries bill avoided impacting champions' relatives; comments on Cothren's Democratic nomination defended.