Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 10, 1796
The Patowmac Guardian, And Berkeley Advertiser
Martinsburg, Shepherdstown, Berkeley County, Jefferson County, West Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial opposes excluding printers from Congress, advocating public access to debates for accountability amid scattered populace; criticizes stenographer plan as dead and costly, members' fear of scrutiny, and risks of secrecy enabling usurpations.
OCR Quality
70%
Good
Full Text
A representative, who says on the floor of Congress, but per letter [denies it?], such man be trusted. He is unworthy either of public or domestic confidence.
As for the savage clause, 'till a stenographer shall be hired, it is a mere delusion.
The proposal to hire was withdrawn some weeks ago; and it is regarded as not only dead but buried.
Of the house of representatives, that it may be so thoroughly counted by a very large majority.
By imperfection, he could be nothing more or less arrogant. Salary proposed, of four thousand dollars.
Such an officer had been appointed, with the [in this] house six hundred and thirty six dollars per [annum?]; and thus, after pay to make speeches, we are to pay four thousand dollars, as a whip to the reckoning, for a person.
Purpose of electing a stenographer; The jackdaw [would] misrepresent them.
This is the true meaning and he was stripped of borrowed feathers. The advocates [of] excluding publicity are afraid of appearing in [print].
In now.
The people of America are so widely scattered over a boundless continent, the post roads are in so many instances so greatly interrupted, that it [is] hard [to get news]; and the channels of intelligence are,
From one [end to the other], contains an immense number [of people]. The summit of the mountain, or the [valley], in ordinary cases, very difficult to rouse general [attention]. They are satisfied with knowing that the [government] care[s] yet less about the measures of govern[ment]. [Merchants?] and farmers, who know very little, and [care for little else but] priles, and the corn grows, that every man who [is] able and willing to work, may find plentiful em[ployment], and good wages, and that he who hates [exercise], may, by a small degree of skill, defraud
Hence it becomes the peculiar duty of those, whom chance has cast into the focus of observation, to [look] with a diligent eye [on] the measures of Congress, watch the young idea while it shoots, and by a timely disclosure, to nip in the bud, the first bloo[m]
Of legislative encroachment. The most dangerous usurpations have often been disguised under
[Pre]titles of prerogative and privilege.
In defense of this exclusion of printers, it has been urged that the sentiments of members are often
[Mis]taken by the takers of debates. Gentlemen, in that house, are eternally mistaking and misstating [the say]ings of each other. Is a reporter alone con[demned]
to be infallible? Have not the printers of [Phil]adelphia been always ready to publish correct[ions].
And they have so, and the circumstance is perfectly known. What then are we to think of a legis[l]a
[tor], who desires a privilege of making speeches, [w]hich he is ashamed of owning, when they appear in print, who wishes to put a bridle into the mouths [of]
their constituents, and, with more than Vandal barbarity, to crush the divine art of printing.
As for the savage clause, 'till a stenographer shall be hired, it is a mere delusion.
The proposal to hire was withdrawn some weeks ago; and it is regarded as not only dead but buried.
Of the house of representatives, that it may be so thoroughly counted by a very large majority.
By imperfection, he could be nothing more or less arrogant. Salary proposed, of four thousand dollars.
Such an officer had been appointed, with the [in this] house six hundred and thirty six dollars per [annum?]; and thus, after pay to make speeches, we are to pay four thousand dollars, as a whip to the reckoning, for a person.
Purpose of electing a stenographer; The jackdaw [would] misrepresent them.
This is the true meaning and he was stripped of borrowed feathers. The advocates [of] excluding publicity are afraid of appearing in [print].
In now.
The people of America are so widely scattered over a boundless continent, the post roads are in so many instances so greatly interrupted, that it [is] hard [to get news]; and the channels of intelligence are,
From one [end to the other], contains an immense number [of people]. The summit of the mountain, or the [valley], in ordinary cases, very difficult to rouse general [attention]. They are satisfied with knowing that the [government] care[s] yet less about the measures of govern[ment]. [Merchants?] and farmers, who know very little, and [care for little else but] priles, and the corn grows, that every man who [is] able and willing to work, may find plentiful em[ployment], and good wages, and that he who hates [exercise], may, by a small degree of skill, defraud
Hence it becomes the peculiar duty of those, whom chance has cast into the focus of observation, to [look] with a diligent eye [on] the measures of Congress, watch the young idea while it shoots, and by a timely disclosure, to nip in the bud, the first bloo[m]
Of legislative encroachment. The most dangerous usurpations have often been disguised under
[Pre]titles of prerogative and privilege.
In defense of this exclusion of printers, it has been urged that the sentiments of members are often
[Mis]taken by the takers of debates. Gentlemen, in that house, are eternally mistaking and misstating [the say]ings of each other. Is a reporter alone con[demned]
to be infallible? Have not the printers of [Phil]adelphia been always ready to publish correct[ions].
And they have so, and the circumstance is perfectly known. What then are we to think of a legis[l]a
[tor], who desires a privilege of making speeches, [w]hich he is ashamed of owning, when they appear in print, who wishes to put a bridle into the mouths [of]
their constituents, and, with more than Vandal barbarity, to crush the divine art of printing.
What sub-type of article is it?
Press Freedom
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
Press Freedom
Congressional Debates
Public Access
Stenographer Proposal
Legislative Secrecy
Philadelphia Printers
What entities or persons were involved?
House Of Representatives
Members Of Congress
Philadelphia Printers
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Opposition To Exclusion Of Printers From Congressional Debates
Stance / Tone
Strongly Pro Press Access And Critical Of Congressional Secrecy
Key Figures
House Of Representatives
Members Of Congress
Philadelphia Printers
Key Arguments
A Representative Who Contradicts Public Statements Privately Cannot Be Trusted
The Stenographer Hiring Proposal Is Dead And Delusional
Advocates Of Excluding Publicity Fear Appearing In Print
The Scattered American Public Requires Vigilant Oversight Of Congress To Prevent Encroachments
Congressional Secrecy Disguises Usurpations Under Privileges
Reporters Are Not Infallible But Publish Corrections, Unlike Members Who Misstate Each Other
Legislators Seeking To Suppress Printing Are Ashamed Of Their Speeches And Barbaric