Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 19, 1843
Republican Herald
Providence, Providence County, Rhode Island
What is this article about?
Editorial defends Democrats accepting offices under President Tyler's administration, arguing it does not compromise their principles or allegiance to figures like Van Buren and Calhoun. Emphasizes Tyler's Democratic stance and advises office-holders to support the party without question.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The idea that some few individuals entertain, that by accepting office under the present administration, you necessarily become, from that circumstance alone, opponents of Van Buren, Calhoun, Cass, Johnson or Woodbury, or decided friends of Tyler, is a very wrong and unjust one. The President has committed none of his recently appointed officers in Massachusetts, to himself for the Presidency, nor has he made it a remote condition. The question who are you in favor of for President, we know has not been asked. Then how is it possible that the mere fact of a man's accepting office, compromises his principles, forfeits his integrity, or puts him beyond the pale of the Democratic party? It is clear to our mind, then, that the mere accepting of an office is not wrong.
The President says he is a disciple of Thomas Jefferson, that his course is to be Democratic, and that his appointments shall be so, also. All this being the case why should not Democrats avail themselves of this great advantage. Suppose the President should not take the strictly Democratic direction, Mr. Henshaw would not remain in the Cabinet a moment.—But how should an office-holder out of the Ten Miles Square behave—not to compromise his principles, simply act with the regular organized Democratic Party, and vote for its men and measures. Could Democrats object to this? Could Democrats be read out of the Party, for being Democrats, and going where Democratic Principles go —Salem Advertiser.
The President says he is a disciple of Thomas Jefferson, that his course is to be Democratic, and that his appointments shall be so, also. All this being the case why should not Democrats avail themselves of this great advantage. Suppose the President should not take the strictly Democratic direction, Mr. Henshaw would not remain in the Cabinet a moment.—But how should an office-holder out of the Ten Miles Square behave—not to compromise his principles, simply act with the regular organized Democratic Party, and vote for its men and measures. Could Democrats object to this? Could Democrats be read out of the Party, for being Democrats, and going where Democratic Principles go —Salem Advertiser.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Democratic Party
Presidential Appointments
Political Integrity
Tyler Administration
Van Buren
Calhoun
What entities or persons were involved?
Van Buren
Calhoun
Cass
Johnson
Woodbury
Tyler
Thomas Jefferson
Mr. Henshaw
Salem Advertiser
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Accepting Office Under Tyler Without Compromising Democratic Principles
Stance / Tone
Defensive Of Democratic Office Holders
Key Figures
Van Buren
Calhoun
Cass
Johnson
Woodbury
Tyler
Thomas Jefferson
Mr. Henshaw
Salem Advertiser
Key Arguments
Accepting Office Under Tyler Does Not Make One An Opponent Of Democratic Candidates Like Van Buren
Tyler Has Not Required Appointees To Support His Presidency
Mere Acceptance Of Office Does Not Compromise Principles Or Integrity
Tyler Claims To Follow Jeffersonian Democratic Principles
Democrats Should Take Advantage Of Appointments
Henshaw Would Leave Cabinet If Tyler Deviates From Democratic Path
Office Holders Should Support The Democratic Party's Men And Measures