Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
September 24, 1904
Chicago Eagle
Chicago, Cook County County, Illinois
What is this article about?
Editorial condemns light sentence for bank president embezzling funds versus six years for stealing a chicken, arguing this disparity exemplifies unjust system fueling socialism; calls for life imprisonment to restore confidence.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
In the same penitentiary to which this bank president is committed a man is serving six years for stealing a chicken. In giving an account of the rich prisoner's demeanor the press reports say he "took his sentence very calmly."
No doubt of it. And so did the judge who sentenced him take the sentence calmly—too calmly to suit the sense of justice of decent people.
It is said that socialism is on the increase in this country. There is no doubt of it. And the reasons are plain. One reason may easily be discovered in the modern instance just recited. The socialist can hold up this deadly parallel and say, "That is justice as it is exemplified under your present system of society? How do you like it?" The man in charge of a bank who loots it is ten times meaner than the ordinary robber. The banker robs those who trust him. He is about the only man in the community who is permitted to handle funds without a bond. When he proves recreant to his trust he strikes a body blow at confidence. He should receive the maximum punishment and that maximum should be imprisonment for life. The people are slowly formulating this belief: If you steal a little you will get the limit. If you steal enough you will be let off easy. That is a dangerous belief, but not so dangerous as the facts that go to make up the belief.
No doubt of it. And so did the judge who sentenced him take the sentence calmly—too calmly to suit the sense of justice of decent people.
It is said that socialism is on the increase in this country. There is no doubt of it. And the reasons are plain. One reason may easily be discovered in the modern instance just recited. The socialist can hold up this deadly parallel and say, "That is justice as it is exemplified under your present system of society? How do you like it?" The man in charge of a bank who loots it is ten times meaner than the ordinary robber. The banker robs those who trust him. He is about the only man in the community who is permitted to handle funds without a bond. When he proves recreant to his trust he strikes a body blow at confidence. He should receive the maximum punishment and that maximum should be imprisonment for life. The people are slowly formulating this belief: If you steal a little you will get the limit. If you steal enough you will be let off easy. That is a dangerous belief, but not so dangerous as the facts that go to make up the belief.
What sub-type of article is it?
Crime Or Punishment
Social Reform
What keywords are associated?
Sentencing Inequality
Bank Embezzlement
Justice System Critique
Socialism Rise
Criminal Punishment
Public Trust Betrayal
What entities or persons were involved?
Bank President
Chicken Thief
Judge
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Inequality In Sentencing For Theft
Stance / Tone
Critical Of Lenient Punishment For Wealthy Criminals
Key Figures
Bank President
Chicken Thief
Judge
Key Arguments
Bank President Receives Lenient Sentence Compared To Chicken Thief's Six Years
Judge's Calm Sentencing Offends Sense Of Justice
Unequal Justice Fuels Rise Of Socialism
Banker Who Loots Is Meaner Than Ordinary Robber As He Betrays Trust
Bankers Handle Funds Without Bonds
Such Crimes Strike At Public Confidence
Maximum Punishment Should Be Life Imprisonment
Belief That Small Thefts Get Harsh Penalties While Large Ones Get Leniency Is Dangerous