Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Patowmac Guardian, And Berkeley Advertiser
Martinsburg, Shepherdstown, Berkeley County, Jefferson County, West Virginia
What is this article about?
South Carolina Governor William Moultrie seeks details from French Minister Genet on a reported clash with President Washington over a prize ship. Genet defends his conduct, plans to submit records to Congress, and reaffirms respect for Washington. (Dates: Sept 5-Oct 15, 1793; New York/Charleston.)
OCR Quality
Full Text
Copy of a letter from William Moultrie, governor of South Carolina to Citizen Genet, minister plenipotentiary from the French republic to the United States of America.
Charleston, Sept. 5th, 1793.
Dear Sir,
Through the medium of the northern newspapers we in this state have been informed, that a dispute had taken place between the President of the United States and yourself, on one point relating to a prize; and upon your deciding thereon, you said with a degree of warmth, that you would appeal to the people. Viewing it as here represented, many real friends to the republic of France have taken great offence, as it conveys insult to a character, highly respected by his country, independent of the station which he fills: from hence much conversation and warm altercation arises.
My regard for your person, as well as being the representative of a nation I really esteem, induces me to request from you an exact relation of what did happen in your dispute, if any you have had; and that you would, in favoring me in my request, mention the time, the place, and the manner; because opinions lead people more often astray for want of the knowledge of particulars. For my part, be assured my regard for you leads me to suppose, that your good sense could not permit you to behave with the least impropriety to the president.
I have the honor to be, dear sir,
with great regard,
your most obedient,
humble servant,
WILLIAM MOULTRIE.
Citizen GENET's Answer.
New York, October 15th, 1793, the 2d year of the French republic.
Dear SIR,
I should long since have exposed the authors of the falsehoods, which a dark and deep intrigue has laid to my charge, if I could have condescended to put myself on a level with those men, whom I too much despise to produce proofs against the absurdity of their accusations. But it is not thus that the representative of a great people should conduct himself—it is not sufficient that he exposes those who traduce him, he ought to demand their punishment and to obtain it, if the representative of the sovereignty where he resides does justice.
It is to congress that I shall address myself, through the medium of the executive of the United States, to ask the severest examination of all my official measures, and of every particular step which may be supposed to have been an attempt upon the established authority of the American Republic: I shall conceal nothing, sir, from this august body: I shall place under the inspection of every member, my instructions, my correspondence and conferences with the federal government: my correspondence with the French government: my instructions to the consuls of the republic, and my correspondence with them: and, I hope that the result of the examination of these documents, and the analysis of the pretended threat imputed to me, of appealing to the people, will be a thorough conviction, that if I have spoken to your government, with the energy of a freeman, with the enthusiasm which at this day inspires and animates every Frenchman really attached to his country: if I have complained officially, and in no other way of the conduct of certain officers of the federal government, whose intentions appeared to me both destructive of liberty, and favorable to our enemies: if I have declared that their teneteness, that their ill measures in the common danger which menaces free nations, did not appear to me to be consistent with the sentiments of their fellow-citizens, with the true interests of their country: if I have expressed without disguise, my grief at seeing general Washington, that celebrated hero of liberty, accessible to men whose schemes could only darken his glory: if by this boldness, I have made myself the mark for all the resentment their utmost perfidy can occasion, I have never forgotten what I owe to the supreme head of the executive of a great people, who were the first to open the career to freedom, the first to proclaim the rights of man, and whose existence is as dear to us, as ours is necessary to them.
I am as jealous of the esteem of the Americans, as that of my fellow-citizens, and whatever efforts may be made to deprive me of it, I flatter myself with confidence, that I shall wholly preserve it. I believe that I shall be always deemed worthy in their eyes, of the fraternal reception they gave me from Charleston to New-York; and, I make no doubt, finally, that the brave general Moultrie, will never regret to have been the first to acknowledge in me, the envoy of the French republic and to have heaped on me those kind nesses and obliging attentions : the recollection of which will be never effaced from my memory.
GENET.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Foreign News Details
Primary Location
United States
Event Date
September 5 To October 15, 1793
Key Persons
Outcome
genet plans to submit documents to congress for examination of his conduct; no resolution reported
Event Details
William Moultrie, governor of South Carolina, writes to Citizen Genet on September 5, 1793, requesting details of a reported dispute with President Washington over a prize, where Genet allegedly threatened to appeal to the people. Genet replies from New York on October 15, 1793, denying impropriety, defending his energetic representations to the US government, expressing respect for Washington, and intending to address Congress via the executive to clear his actions.