Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeLos Angeles Daily Herald
Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California
What is this article about?
California's new school law has irregularities in funding mechanisms and distribution for the state school fund next year, aiming to support poorer counties from richer ones. Apportionment totals $1,241,400 for 111,610 children across counties, exceeding the $1,100,000 raisable limit. Table details allocations and child numbers.
Merged-components note: The story explicitly refers to the tabular statement below; merged with the table. Relabeled to domestic_news as content concerns California school funding distribution.
OCR Quality
Full Text
There is the usual amount of irregularity in the new sections of our school law added by the last session of the Legislature. The means for raising the required amount of money is not provided, and there is an irregularity in the distribution of the fund. The object of the compilers of the law, which is too long for reproduction in our columns, appears to have been to compel the rich and more densely populated counties to furnish the funds for the maintenance of schools in poorer localities, where the full amount could not be raised without resort to special taxation. The irregularity of apportionment will be seen by glancing at the tabular statement below. Mendocino county, with little more than one-third the number of children, receives more than one-half the amount apportioned to Los Angeles county, while Alameda county, with a greater number of children, receives little more than half the amount awarded to Los Angeles county. Sacramento county, with a less number of children, receives a larger apportionment than Los Angeles county. The disproportion, to a greater or less degree, is noticeable in all the counties, from Alameda to Yuba. The aggregate apportionment amounts to $1,241,400, yet under the law only $1,100,000 can be raised. In the tabular statement the number of children are given as far as last report:
Total $1,241,400; 111,610 children.
| COUNTY. | Apportionment. | No. of Children. |
| Alameda | $31,000 | 6,751 |
| Alpine | 2,000 | 113 |
| Amador | 20,500 | 2,134 |
| Butte | 29,300 | 2,707 |
| Calaveras | 21,500 | 2,215 |
| Colusa | 21,300 | 1,686 |
| Contra Costa | 24,500 | 2,003 |
| Del Norte | 4,500 | 348 |
| El Dorado | 24,000 | 2,304 |
| Fresno | 11,500 | 1,055 |
| Humboldt | 19,500 | 2,059 |
| Inyo | 4,000 | 294 |
| Kern | 6,500 | 614 |
| Klamath | 2,500 | 276 |
| Lake | 12,300 | 1,021 |
| Lassen | 6,500 | 554 |
| Los Angeles | 48,500 | 6,101 |
| Marin | 14,300 | 1,410 |
| Mariposa | 9,000 | 956 |
| Mendocino | 26,000 | 2,407 |
| Merced | 11,000 | 927 |
| Mono | 2,000 | 90 |
| Monterey | 36,000 | 3,643 |
| Napa | 28,900 | 2,109 |
| Nevada | 35,000 | 4,154 |
| Placer | 25,100 | 2,166 |
| Plumas | 12,500 | 761 |
| Sacramento | 49,100 | 5,425 |
| San Bernardino | 14,000 | 1,562 |
| San Diego | 12,800 | 1,297 |
| San Francisco | 215,000 | 34,469 |
| San Joaquin | 47,900 | 4,909 |
| San Luis Obispo | 15,500 | 1,633 |
| San Mateo | 18,300 | 1,978 |
| Santa Barbara | 12,000 | 1,706 |
| Santa Clara | 55,000 | 6,762 |
| Santa Cruz | 22,500 | 2,627 |
| Shasta | 15,300 | 1,327 |
| Sierra | 12,100 | 980 |
| Siskiyou | 29,000 | 2,400 |
| Solano | 32,500 | 3,716 |
| Sonoma | 59,800 | 5,899 |
| Stanislaus | 20,500 | 1,712 |
| Sutter | 18,000 | 1,290 |
| Tehama | 12,000 | 1,194 |
| Trinity | 5,500 | 530 |
| Tulare | 19,000 | 1,751 |
| Tuolumne | 15,500 | 1,794 |
| Ventura | 8,500 | 937 |
| Yolo | 24,300 | 2,119 |
| Yuba | 23,300 | 2,385 |
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
California
Event Date
For Next Year
Outcome
apportionment totals $1,241,400 for 111,610 children, but only $1,100,000 can be raised under the law.
Event Details
New sections of school law from last legislative session have irregularities in raising and distributing funds, intended to make richer counties support poorer ones. Disproportions noted in allocations to counties like Mendocino, Alameda, Los Angeles, and Sacramento. Table provides county-by-county breakdown.