Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Phenix
Domestic News December 30, 1837

The Phenix

Bristol, Bristol County, Rhode Island

What is this article about?

In Boston's Supreme Court, Joseph A. Whitmarsh was called for sentencing on a libel conviction, but he absconded, resulting in default judgment against him and his bail. His advocate, Mr. Hallett, argued for leniency due to monomania's influence and declined to challenge the legality of libel in Massachusetts.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

In the Supreme Court yesterday, Joseph A. Whitmarsh was called to be sentenced—Mr. Hallett, his advocate, who has argued his cause three times, to different juries, occupying six hours each time, having declined to bring the question, whether libelling was a crime in Massachusetts! before the whole Court as a question of law. Mr. Hallett has given express notice to this effect, and applied for a mitigated sentence, upon the ground that his client labored under a monomania upon the peculiar subject of the libellous matter. The same Mr. Whitmarsh has recently been convicted of another libel at New Bedford, before the Common Pleas, which last libel was also published in the "Illuminator," a paper now said to be stopped. The Supreme Court here are disposed to give a mild sentence, considering all circumstances, but he was among the missing, and he and his bail were defaulted.—Boston Centinel.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court Crime

What keywords are associated?

Libel Conviction Supreme Court Joseph Whitmarsh Mr Hallett Monomania Boston New Bedford

What entities or persons were involved?

Joseph A. Whitmarsh Mr. Hallett

Where did it happen?

Boston

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Boston

Event Date

Yesterday

Key Persons

Joseph A. Whitmarsh Mr. Hallett

Outcome

whitmarsh failed to appear for sentencing; he and his bail were defaulted. court inclined toward mild sentence considering circumstances.

Event Details

Joseph A. Whitmarsh was called for sentencing in the Supreme Court for libel. His advocate, Mr. Hallett, who argued the case multiple times, declined to challenge whether libel is a crime in Massachusetts as a legal question and sought a mitigated sentence due to Whitmarsh's monomania on the subject. Whitmarsh had a recent prior libel conviction in New Bedford published in the 'Illuminator' newspaper, now stopped.

Are you sure?