Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Watchman And Southron
Domestic News July 7, 1920

The Watchman And Southron

Sumter, Sumter County, South Carolina

What is this article about?

In Columbia on July 7, the fifth day of the trial of South Carolina vs. Columbia Railway, Gas and Electric Company for recovering the Columbia Canal ended with the state closing its case. The defendant's motion for non-suit was overruled by Judge Townsend, raising potential U.S. Supreme Court issues. Defense testimony to begin.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Columbia, July 7.—The fifth day in the trial of the case of the State of South Carolina against the Columbia Railway, Gas and Electric company for the recovery of the Columbia canal, involving several millions of dollars, plodded its weary length along through six hours of technical evidence yesterday until just before adjournment when the State announced that it had closed its case in chief.

Thereupon a motion for non-suit was made by counsel for the defendant and after argument was overruled by Judge Townsend.

Grounds upon which the motion was predicated raise questions involving the constitution of the United States, which it is possible may take the case to the United States supreme court.

The defense will begin its testimony this morning.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Columbia Canal Trial South Carolina Lawsuit Railway Company Non Suit Motion Judge Townsend

What entities or persons were involved?

Judge Townsend

Where did it happen?

Columbia

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Columbia

Event Date

July 7.

Key Persons

Judge Townsend

Outcome

motion for non-suit overruled by judge townsend; defense to begin testimony this morning.

Event Details

The fifth day in the trial of the State of South Carolina against the Columbia Railway, Gas and Electric company for the recovery of the Columbia canal, involving several millions of dollars, featured six hours of technical evidence. The State announced it had closed its case in chief just before adjournment. A motion for non-suit by defendant counsel was argued and overruled. Grounds involve U.S. Constitution questions, possibly leading to U.S. Supreme Court.

Are you sure?