Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeRichmond Enquirer
Richmond, Richmond County, Virginia
What is this article about?
Political report from Albemarle canvass detailing debates between candidates Leake and Rives, praising Leake's defense of Democratic principles and condemning Rives' apparent reversal on constitutional limits and support for a reformed national bank, viewing it as dangerous federalism.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Has been conducted in the most Democratic division of the State, with few particulars of the campaign:
"We can get no full account of the canvass, which The Jefferson
Republican of Thursday, gives us
Porter's, and Batesville. We learn from different
the county.
The candidates have met at Scottsville,
advantage at Batesville. We think that this result
W Rives at Porter's, and that he gained a very decided
Scottsville: that, even by the admission of a very intelligent Whig of another county, he was too much for
himself
as man of talents and a good debater, and is defending
whenever
they
meet
Leake
the principles with which he grew up. Mr. Rives, on
the contrary, is in the unfortunate position of defending
the Union; and this alone, to say nothing of the superiority
condemned
gority of Mr. Leake's talents and cause, is a great
advantage. We hear from a Democrat that Mr.
Rives' speech at Batesville was not so strongly
Bank-scented as the one made here at Court. It seems
he now goes for a Bank purged of its corruptions, and
requiring the assent of the States. We do not know
whether this will satisfy his nominators, but we do
know that it will only make him more objectionable to
Democrats. No Constitutional Republican, no Democrat
can admit that an infraction of the Constitution
rights of the minority may, in that way, at any time,
assent
States
because
General Government should determine to adopt Alexander
majority
Suppose
should supersede the Governors of the States by Deputy
Administration
puppets appointed by the President. Could the consent
of the States make it constitutional? Every one will
see, that the principle Mr. Rives contends for will answer
in the affirmative. And so every violation of the
Constitution, and every invasion of the rights of the
every thing like Constitutional Government.
The principle is as preposterous as it is destructive to
People can be fixed forever by the assent of the States.
all respect for Mr. Rives, that it has not astonished us.
shocked our political sense, though we may say, with
"But there was one declaration made by him that
unshipped his rudder, and is now upon the lee shore of
scudding: he has thrown away his chart and compass, and
That gentleman is completely out of his political reckoning.
upon him, and he scuds along driving resistlessly upon
Federalism. A Democratic gale has suddenly come
those dangerous rocks, there to be wrecked and stranded.
ed. and thereto remain immoveably a beacon and a
warning. Can those who knew him in his better day,
when he revelled in the confidence of a grateful and
affectionate constituency, 'looking forward to him with
hope for to-morrow,' believe that he now wars with all
his old notions of strict construction, and of a limited
government, and proclaims "that there is a principle of
growth in the Constitution, engrafted upon it by its
Framers,' which shall authorize the introduction of new powers, that may be assumed according to emergency. The part quoted contains his words, the other
the substance of his conclusion from them.
The name
of our informant is at Mr. Rives' service."
We agree with the Charlottesville Republican, that
this is one of the most outrageous heresies which has
ever been propagated. It is worthy of the worst days
of Alexander Hamilton, and of John Adams. It is
only the "general welfare" doctrine in another form.
It changes the whole character of our Government
It supersedes the necessity of all the specifications in
the Constitution. It essentially concedes, in fact, to the
Federal Government all power to do every thing, which
its departments may be pleased to think calculated to
ed for by any emergency. This is Federal doctrine, in
correspond with this new principle of growth, and call.
that if the powers actually given should fall short, then
its very worst form. The old Republican doctrine was,
more will be conceded by the States, according to the
so admirably taught, in his casting speech—Never assume a doubtful power; but if the powers originally
given be insufficient to carry out the purposes of the
Government, then wait and ask for additional powers
from the parties to the compact.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Story Details
Key Persons
Location
Albemarle (Scottsville, Porter's, Batesville)
Story Details
Report on the political canvass in Albemarle between Democratic candidate Leake and Whig Rives, highlighting Leake's strong performances in debates and criticizing Rives for shifting positions on constitutional principles, the bank, and federal powers.